Literature DB >> 8848450

Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats.

W Gong1, D B Neill, J B Justice.   

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that rats showing a strong locomotor response to a novel environment have a greater locomotor response to psycho-stimulant drugs and more rapidly acquire intravenous self-administration of amphetamine. In this report, we examined whether these high-responder (HR) rats would develop place-preference conditioning with cocaine more readily than low-responder (LR) rats. Neither group of rats developed conditioned place preference for cocaine, 2.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (IP). Both groups of rats developed conditioned place preference for cocaine, 5.0 and 15 mg/kg, IP. However, we could not find any evidence of enhanced conditioning in the HR rats. HR rats did show a greater locomotor response to cocaine, 15 mg/kg, IP, and the locomotor response of HR and LR rats to cocaine correlated with their response to a novel environment. We conclude that using the place-preference procedure, HR and LR rats do not differ in the rewarding effect of cocaine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8848450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  20 in total

1.  Preferences for cocaine- or pup-associated chambers differentiates otherwise behaviorally identical postpartum maternal rats.

Authors:  Brandi J Mattson; Sharon E Williams; Jay S Rosenblatt; Joan I Morrell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Response to novelty and cocaine stimulant effects: lack of stability across environments in female Swiss mice.

Authors:  Laura Nyssen; Christian Brabant; Vincent Didone; Etienne Quertemont
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Locomotor activity predicts acquisition of self-administration behavior but not cocaine intake.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mitchell; Chris L Cunningham; Gregory P Mark
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Low and high locomotor responsiveness to cocaine predicts intravenous cocaine conditioned place preference in male Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Richard M Allen; Carson V Everett; Anna M Nelson; Joshua M Gulley; Nancy R Zahniser
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Individual differences in the improvement of cocaine-induced place preference response by the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 in rats.

Authors:  Nancy Capriles; Stanley Watson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Role of individual and developmental differences in voluntary cocaine intake in rats.

Authors:  Nicole L Schramm-Sapyta; Marty C Cauley; Dalene K Stangl; Susan Glowacz; K Amy Stepp; Edward D Levin; Cynthia M Kuhn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Simultaneous expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization and conditioned place preference in individual rats.

Authors:  Claire M Seymour; John J Wagner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Differential effects of novelty exposure on place preference conditioning to amphetamine and its oral consumption.

Authors:  Y Pelloux; J Costentin; D Duterte-Boucher
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Individual differences in cocaine-induced locomotor activity in male Sprague-Dawley rats and their acquisition of and motivation to self-administer cocaine.

Authors:  Bruce H Mandt; Susan Schenk; Nancy R Zahniser; Richard M Allen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. II. Agonist-induced antinociception and antagonist-induced suppression of fluid consumption.

Authors:  David A White; Mikhail Kalinichev; Stephen G Holtzman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-07-02       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.