RATIONALE: Factors that increase an individual's susceptibility to cocaine dependence remain largely unknown. We have previously shown that adult outbred male Sprague-Dawley rats can be classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity following the administration of a single dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, LCR/HCR classification predicts dopamine transporter function/inhibition, cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, and cocaine-conditioned place preference. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed LCR/HCR classification and the development of locomotor sensitization on the latency to acquire cocaine self-administration and motivation to self-administer cocaine. RESULTS: LCRs and HCRs did not differ in their latency to acquire low-dose cocaine self-administration (0.25 mg/kg/infusion over 12 s, fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement). In a follow-up experiment, repeated experimenter-administered injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in locomotor sensitization for LCRs, but not HCRs; nonetheless, all rats exhibited decreased latency to acquire cocaine self-administration compared to the first experiment. Repeated cocaine preexposure and LCR/HCR classification predicted break point when rats responded for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion; multiple exposure>single exposure, LCR>HCR), but there was no interaction between these variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although LCR/HCR classification did not predict the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration under these conditions, LCR rats demonstrated greater responding for cocaine after acquisition (PR). Thus, these findings demonstrate the relevance of using the LCR/HCR model when studying susceptibility to cocaine dependence.
RATIONALE: Factors that increase an individual's susceptibility to cocaine dependence remain largely unknown. We have previously shown that adult outbred male Sprague-Dawley rats can be classified as either low or high cocaine responders (LCRs or HCRs, respectively) based on their locomotor activity following the administration of a single dose of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Furthermore, LCR/HCR classification predicts dopamine transporter function/inhibition, cocaine-induced locomotor sensitization, and cocaine-conditioned place preference. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed LCR/HCR classification and the development of locomotor sensitization on the latency to acquire cocaine self-administration and motivation to self-administer cocaine. RESULTS: LCRs and HCRs did not differ in their latency to acquire low-dose cocaine self-administration (0.25 mg/kg/infusion over 12 s, fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement). In a follow-up experiment, repeated experimenter-administered injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) resulted in locomotor sensitization for LCRs, but not HCRs; nonetheless, all rats exhibited decreased latency to acquire cocaine self-administration compared to the first experiment. Repeated cocaine preexposure and LCR/HCR classification predicted break point when rats responded for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement (0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/kg/infusion; multiple exposure>single exposure, LCR>HCR), but there was no interaction between these variables. CONCLUSIONS: Although LCR/HCR classification did not predict the rate of acquisition of cocaine self-administration under these conditions, LCR rats demonstrated greater responding for cocaine after acquisition (PR). Thus, these findings demonstrate the relevance of using the LCR/HCR model when studying susceptibility to cocaine dependence.
Authors: Nobuyoshi Suto; Lauren M Tanabe; Jennifer D Austin; Elizabeth Creekmore; Paul Vezina Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2003-03-05 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: T Wiltshire; R B Ervin; H Duan; M A Bogue; W C Zamboni; S Cook; W Chung; F Zou; L M Tarantino Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.449
Authors: Nicole L Schramm-Sapyta; Marty C Cauley; Dalene K Stangl; Susan Glowacz; K Amy Stepp; Edward D Levin; Cynthia M Kuhn Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: R Christopher Pierce; Bruno Fant; Sarah E Swinford-Jackson; Elizabeth A Heller; Wade H Berrettini; Mathieu E Wimmer Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Elena V Romanova; Stanislav S Rubakhin; John R Ossyra; Jonathan A Zombeck; Michael R Nosek; Jonathan V Sweedler; Justin S Rhodes Journal: J Neurochem Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 5.372
Authors: Amanda E D Van Swearingen; Cristina L Sanchez; Suzanne M Frisbee; Antonia Williams; Q David Walker; Kenneth S Korach; Cynthia M Kuhn Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2013-04-19 Impact factor: 5.250