Literature DB >> 8847160

What is the role of the immune system in determining individually distinct body odours?

R E Brown1.   

Abstract

Genetically inbred mice and rats which are identical except for the genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) produce unique urinary odours which can be discriminated by other animals. Congenic strains differing in both the Class I and Class II regions of the MHC produce distinct urinary odours. These urine odours can be used for mate selection and parental recognition, and it has been suggested that they provide a unique genetic mechanism for kin recognition. However, the non-MHC genes and the X and Y chromosomes also modulate the urinary odours of rodents, and rearing rats in a bacteria-free environment inhibits the production of unique MHC-related odours. We have found that dietary differences produce a greater effect on individual odours than differences at one MHC locus. These results suggest that the MHC, commensal bacteria, and dietary products interact to produce urinary odours which can be used for individual recognition in rodents. The problem is: what is the role of the immune system in determining individually distinct body odours? A model that suggests possible answers to this question is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8847160     DOI: 10.1016/0192-0561(95)00052-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Immunopharmacol        ISSN: 0192-0561


  10 in total

1.  Olfactory fingerprints for major histocompatibility complex-determined body odors.

Authors:  M L Schaefer; D A Young; D Restrepo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors.

Authors:  C M Nevison; C J Barnard; R J Beynon; J L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Keiko Arakawa; Christopher Dunlap; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  To bite or not to bite! A questionnaire-based survey assessing why some people are bitten more than others by midges.

Authors:  James G Logan; James I Cook; Nina M Stanczyk; Emma Ni Weeks; Sue J Welham; A Jennifer Mordue Luntz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  A new test paradigm for social recognition evidenced by urinary scent marking behavior in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Arakawa; Keiko Arakawa; D Caroline Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The ownership signature in mouse scent marks is involatile.

Authors:  C M Nevison; S Armstrong; R J Beynon; R E Humphries; J L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Parasitized female mice display reduced aversive responses to the odours of infected males.

Authors:  M Kavaliers; D D Colwell; E Choleris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Encoding choosiness: female attraction requires prior physical contact with individual male scents in mice.

Authors:  Steven A Ramm; Sarah A Cheetham; Jane L Hurst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  MHC odours are not required or sufficient for recognition of individual scent owners.

Authors:  Jane L Hurst; Michael D Thom; Charlotte M Nevison; Richard E Humphries; Robert J Beynon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  New prospects for research on manipulation of insect vectors by pathogens.

Authors:  Thierry Lefèvre; Jacob C Koella; François Renaud; Hilary Hurd; David G Biron; Frédéric Thomas
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.823

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.