Literature DB >> 6189692

Brain stem auditory, pattern-reversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size.

T Allison, C C Wood, W R Goff.   

Abstract

To determine standards of normality for auditory, somatosensory and visual evoked potentials commonly used in the assessment of neurological disease, 8 AEP, 1 VEP and 12 SEP components were recorded to stimulation of left and right ears, eyes, and median nerves in 286 normal subjects ranging in age from 4 to 95 years. Peak and interpeak latencies, and left-right differences in latency, were analyzed as a function of age, sex, and estimates of brain and body size. Major features of the results were: (1) Peak latencies of all components showed statistically significant increases in latency with age except that VEP P100 latency decreased significantly between 4 and 19 years and did not change between 20 and 59 years. (2) In adults the peak latencies of all components were significantly later in males than in females. For AEPs and VEPs these differences were explained by sex differences in brain size, and for adult SEPs were explained by sex differences in arm and shoulder dimensions. No significant sex differences in VEP and SEP latencies were seen in children. (3) Most interpeak latencies showed significant differences in relation to age or sex. (4) Age and sex are useful predictors of latency for nearly all peak and interpeak latencies; in addition, height is a useful predictor of SEP peak latencies. (5) Left-right latency differences showed little age-related, and no sex-related, change. The interlaboratory use of these or other normative data was discussed. It was concluded that these AEP and SEP norms can probably be used in other laboratories if stimulating and recording conditions are similar. However, VEP results are difficult to transfer due to the poorly understood effects of variation in stimulus conditions. Some issues regarding the optimal characterization of norms were also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6189692     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90272-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  36 in total

1.  Tools for acquisition, processing and knowledge-based diagnostic of the electroencephalogram and visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  L Moreno; J L Sánchez; S Mañas; J D Piñeiro; J J Merino; J Sigut; R M Aguilar; J I Estévez; R Marichal
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Multifocal VEP in children: its maturation and clinical application.

Authors:  C Balachandran; A I Klistorner; F Billson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Visual Evoked Potentials: Normative Values and Gender Differences.

Authors:  Ruby Sharma; Sandeep Joshi; K D Singh; Avnish Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-07-01

4.  Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille; Garnett McMillan; Susan Griest; Daniel McDermott; Stephen A Fausti; Donald F Austin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Neuroradiological, neurophysiological and anatomopathological study of a case of locked-in syndrome.

Authors:  M Zanardi; M Bonamini; M Rossi
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1991-06

6.  Structural and functional comparison of the persistent and resolved amblyopia.

Authors:  Betul Tugcu; Bilge Araz-Ersan; Ezgi Tuna Erdogan; Hatice Tarakcioglu; Cigdem Coskun; Ulviye Yigit; Sacit Karamursel
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Discriminative power of visual evoked potential characteristics in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M H Cuypers; K Dickson; A J Pinckers; J M Thijssen; O R Hommes
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Gender-based normative values for pattern-reversal and flash visually evoked potentials under binocular and monocular stimulation in healthy adults.

Authors:  Patrícia de Freitas Dotto; Adriana Berezovsky; Paula Yuri Sacai; Daniel Martins Rocha; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Passive attenuation of cortical pattern evoked potentials with increasing body weight in young male rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Andras M Komaromy; Dennis E Brooks; Maria E Kallberg; William W Dawson; Harold L Sapp; Mark B Sherwood; George N Lambrou; Christine L Percicot
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Abnormal auditory forward masking pattern in the brainstem response of individuals with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Johan Källstrand; Olle Olsson; Sara Fristedt Nehlstedt; Mia Ling Sköld; Sören Nielzén
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.