Literature DB >> 8845767

The importance of larger data sets for protein secondary structure prediction with neural networks.

J M Chandonia1, M Karplus.   

Abstract

A neural network algorithm is applied to secondary structure and structural class prediction for a database of 318 nonhomologous protein chains. Significant improvement in accuracy is obtained as compared with performance on smaller databases. A systematic study of the effects of network topology shows that, for the larger database, better results are obtained with more units in the hidden layer. In a 32-fold cross validated test, secondary structure prediction accuracy is 67.0%, relative to 62.6% obtained previously, without any evolutionary information on the sequence. Introduction of sequence profiles increases this value to 72.9%, suggesting that the two types of information are essentially independent. Tertiary structural class is predicted with 80.2% accuracy, relative to 73.9% obtained previously. The use of a larger database is facilitated by the introduction of a scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for optimizing the neural network. This algorithm is about 10-20 times as fast as the standard steepest descent algorithm.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845767      PMCID: PMC2143390          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1975-10-20

Review 2.  Conformational changes involved in the activation of ras p21: implications for related proteins.

Authors:  F Jurnak; S Heffron; E Bergmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  X Zhang; J P Mesirov; D L Waltz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-06-20       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Neural networks for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  L H Holley; M Karplus
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  Improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by an enhanced neural network.

Authors:  D G Kneller; F E Cohen; R Langridge
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models.

Authors:  N Qian; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-08-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Identification of predictive sequence motifs limited by protein structure data base size.

Authors:  M J Rooman; S J Wodak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Protein secondary structure prediction with a neural network.

Authors:  L H Holley; M Karplus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Protein secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  G J Barton
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.809

10.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

View more
  5 in total

1.  Prediction of the location and type of beta-turns in proteins using neural networks.

Authors:  A J Shepherd; D Gorse; J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  StrBioLib: a Java library for development of custom computational structural biology applications.

Authors:  John-Marc Chandonia
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Use of secondary structural information and C alpha-C alpha distance restraints to model protein structures with MODELLER.

Authors:  Boojala V B Reddy; Yiannis N Kaznessis
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Prediction by a neural network of outer membrane beta-strand protein topology.

Authors:  K Diederichs; J Freigang; S Umhau; K Zeth; J Breed
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  How many 3D structures do we need to train a predictor?

Authors:  Pantelis G Bagos; Georgios N Tsaousis; Stavros J Hamodrakas
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.691

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.