Literature DB >> 8845751

Prediction of protein complexes using empirical free energy functions.

Z Weng1, S Vajda, C Delisi.   

Abstract

A long sought goal in the physical chemistry of macromolecular structure, and one directly relevant to understanding the molecular basis of biological recognition, is predicting the geometry of bimolecular complexes from the geometries of their free monomers. Even when the monomers remain relatively unchanged by complex formation, prediction has been difficult because the free energies of alternative conformations of the complex have been difficult to evaluate quickly and accurately. This has forced the use of incomplete target functions, which typically do no better than to provide tens of possible complexes with no way of choosing between them. Here we present a general framework for empirical free energy evaluation and report calculations, based on a relatively complete and easily executable free energy function, that indicate that the structures of complexes can be predicted accurately from the structures of monomers, including close sequence homologues. The calculations also suggest that the binding free energies themselves may be predicted with reasonable accuracy. The method is compared to an alternative formulation that has also been applied recently to the same data set. Both approaches promise to open new opportunities in macromolecular design and specificity modification.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8845751      PMCID: PMC2143396          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560050406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  30 in total

1.  Principles of protein-protein recognition.

Authors:  C Chothia; J Janin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Docking by least-squares fitting of molecular surface patterns.

Authors:  D J Bacon; J Moult
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1992-06-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Co-operativity in protein-protein association. The structure and stability of the actin filament.

Authors:  H P Erickson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides.

Authors:  T Ooi; M Oobatake; G Némethy; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Entropic contributions to rate accelerations in enzymic and intramolecular reactions and the chelate effect.

Authors:  M I Page; W P Jencks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding.

Authors:  D Eisenberg; A D McLachlan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jan 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins.

Authors:  R Abagyan; M Totrov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-21       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The contribution of vibrational entropy to molecular association. The dimerization of insulin.

Authors:  B Tidor; M Karplus
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-05-06       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Evaluation of the conformational free energies of loops in proteins.

Authors:  K C Smith; B Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-02

10.  Prediction of the structure of a receptor-protein complex using a binary docking method.

Authors:  B L Stoddard; D E Koshland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Selecting near-native conformations in homology modeling: the role of molecular mechanics and solvation terms.

Authors:  A Janardhan; S Vajda
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Comparison of binding energies of SrcSH2-phosphotyrosyl peptides with structure-based prediction using surface area based empirical parameterization.

Authors:  D A Henriques; J E Ladbury; R M Jackson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates.

Authors:  Juan Fernández-Recio; Maxim Totrov; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Structure prediction of protein complexes by an NMR-based protein docking algorithm.

Authors:  O Kohlbache; A Burchardt; A Moll; A Hildebrandt; P Bayer; H P Lenhof
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.835

5.  Protein ligand docking based on empirical method for binding affinity estimation.

Authors:  P Tao; L Lai
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.

Authors:  David M Lorber; Maria K Udo; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Association entropy in adsorption processes.

Authors:  N Ben-Tal; B Honig; C K Bagdassarian; A Ben-Shaul
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Improved mapping of protein binding sites.

Authors:  Tamas Kortvelyesi; Michael Silberstein; Sheldon Dennis; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2003 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Structure-based thermodynamic analysis of the dissociation of protein phosphatase-1 catalytic subunit and microcystin-LR docked complexes.

Authors:  P Lavigne; J R Bagu; R Boyko; L Willard; C F Holmes; B D Sykes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Stephen R Comeau; David W Gatchell; Sandor Vajda; Carlos J Camacho
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.