Literature DB >> 11430751

Structure prediction of protein complexes by an NMR-based protein docking algorithm.

O Kohlbache1, A Burchardt, A Moll, A Hildebrandt, P Bayer, H P Lenhof.   

Abstract

Protein docking algorithms can be used to study the driving forces and reaction mechanisms of docking processes. They are also able to speed up the lengthy process of experimental structure elucidation of protein complexes by proposing potential structures. In this paper, we are discussing a variant of the protein-protein docking problem, where the input consists of the tertiary structures of proteins A and B plus an unassigned one-dimensional 1H-NMR spectrum of the complex AB. We present a new scoring function for evaluating and ranking potential complex structures produced by a docking algorithm. The scoring function computes a 'theoretical' 1H-NMR spectrum for each tentative complex structure and subtracts the calculated spectrum from the experimental one. The absolute areas of the difference spectra are then used to rank the potential complex structures. In contrast to formerly published approaches (e.g. [Morelli et al. (2000) Biochemistry, 39, 2530-2537]) we do not use distance constraints (intermolecular NOE constraints). We have tested the approach with four protein complexes whose three-dimensional structures are stored in the PDB data bank (Bernstein et al., 1977) and whose 1H-NMR shift assignments are available from the BMRB database. The best result was obtained for an example, where all standard scoring functions failed completely. Here, our new scoring function achieved an almost perfect separation between good approximations of the true complex structure and false positives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11430751     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011216130486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  24 in total

1.  Validation of a new restraint docking method for solution structure determinations of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  V I Polshakov; W D Morgan; B Birdsall; J Feeney
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  A method for biomolecular structural recognition and docking allowing conformational flexibility.

Authors:  B Sandak; R Nussinov; H J Wolfson
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques.

Authors:  E Katchalski-Katzir; I Shariv; M Eisenstein; A A Friesem; C Aflalo; I A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Protein docking and complementarity.

Authors:  B K Shoichet; I D Kuntz
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1991-09-05       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.

Authors:  R M Jackson; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem.

Authors:  R M Jackson; H A Gabb; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Computational methods for biomolecular docking.

Authors:  T Lengauer; M Rarey
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  The Ca(2+)-dependent interaction of S100B(beta beta) with a peptide derived from p53.

Authors:  R R Rustandi; A C Drohat; D M Baldisseri; P T Wilder; D J Weber
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Detailed ab initio prediction of lysozyme-antibody complex with 1.6 A accuracy.

Authors:  M Totrov; R Abagyan
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1994-04

10.  NMR solution structure of a complex of calmodulin with a binding peptide of the Ca2+ pump.

Authors:  B Elshorst; M Hennig; H Försterling; A Diener; M Maurer; P Schulte; H Schwalbe; C Griesinger; J Krebs; H Schmid; T Vorherr; E Carafoli
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-21       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of quantitative (1)H NMR chemical shift changes for ligand docking into barnase.

Authors:  Marina Cioffi; Christopher A Hunter; Martin J Packer; Maya J Pandya; Mike P Williamson
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  NightShift: NMR shift inference by general hybrid model training--a framework for NMR chemical shift prediction.

Authors:  Anna Katharina Dehof; Simon Loew; Hans-Peter Lenhof; Andreas Hildebrandt
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.