OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference between the predicted and postoperative refraction in eyes with silicone oil that had extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Ophthalmology department providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care in central Israel. METHODS: Eight patients with silicone-oil-filled eyes following vitreoretinal procedures had ECCE and IOL implantation. The IOL power calculation was performed with the modified SRK II, the SRK/T, and the Holladay emmetropia/ametropia formulas, using the axial length of the eye, measured prior to the silicone oil injection, and the keratometric readings. The predicted and postoperative refractions were compared. RESULTS: The postoperative refraction was more hyperopic than predicted by an average of 4.08 diopters (D) for the SRK II formula, 3.91 D for the SRK/T formula, and 4.01 D for the Holladay emmetropia/ametropia formula. Removing the silicone oil from two eyes several months after cataract extraction reduced the deviation from the predicted refraction to 0.25 and 0.80 D. CONCLUSION: The presence of silicone oil in the vitreous space induces a hyperopic shift in eyes having ECCE and IOL implantation. This hyperopic shift should be considered when calculating the IOL power if a long-term tamponade with the oil is planned. If the silicone oil is to be removed shortly after the cataract extraction, the IOL power should be calculated solely from the formula.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference between the predicted and postoperative refraction in eyes with silicone oil that had extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE), and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: Ophthalmology department providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care in central Israel. METHODS: Eight patients with silicone-oil-filled eyes following vitreoretinal procedures had ECCE and IOL implantation. The IOL power calculation was performed with the modified SRK II, the SRK/T, and the Holladay emmetropia/ametropia formulas, using the axial length of the eye, measured prior to the silicone oil injection, and the keratometric readings. The predicted and postoperative refractions were compared. RESULTS: The postoperative refraction was more hyperopic than predicted by an average of 4.08 diopters (D) for the SRK II formula, 3.91 D for the SRK/T formula, and 4.01 D for the Holladay emmetropia/ametropia formula. Removing the silicone oil from two eyes several months after cataract extraction reduced the deviation from the predicted refraction to 0.25 and 0.80 D. CONCLUSION: The presence of silicone oil in the vitreous space induces a hyperopic shift in eyes having ECCE and IOL implantation. This hyperopic shift should be considered when calculating the IOL power if a long-term tamponade with the oil is planned. If the silicone oil is to be removed shortly after the cataract extraction, the IOL power should be calculated solely from the formula.
Authors: Gerd U Auffarth; Tadas Naujokaitis; Louise Blöck; Anna Daghbashyan; Jan Meis; Victor A Augustin; Ramin Khoramnia; Timur M Yildirim Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-01-11