Literature DB >> 8844231

The importance of technology for achieving superior outcomes from intensive care. Brazil APACHE III Study Group.

P G Bastos1, W A Knaus, J E Zimmerman, A Magalhães, X Sun, D P Wagner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that technology availability, staffing, and diagnostic diversity in an intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with the ability to decrease hospital mortality.
DESIGN: Prospective multicenter descriptive cohort study.
SETTING: Ten Brazilian medical-surgical ICUs. PATIENTS: 1734 consecutive adult ICU admissions. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: We recorded the amount of technology, number of diagnoses, and availability of nurses at each ICU. We also used demographic, clinical and physiologic information for an average of 173 admissions to each ICU to calculate standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) for each ICU. The mean SMR for the ten ICUs was 1.67 (range 1.01-2.30). A greater availability of ICU equipment and services was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with a lower SMR.
CONCLUSION: The ability of Brazilian ICUs to reduce hospital mortality is associated with the amount of technology available in these units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8844231     DOI: 10.1007/bf01709743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  22 in total

1.  Rationing critical care -- what happens to patients who are not admitted?

Authors:  P Frisho-Lima; G Gurman; A Schapira; A Porath
Journal:  Theor Surg       Date:  1994-12

2.  What technologies for health care in developing countries?

Authors:  S Perry; E S Marx
Journal:  World Health Forum       Date:  1992

3.  Does quality influence choice of hospital?

Authors:  H S Luft; D W Garnick; D H Mark; D J Peltzman; C S Phibbs; E Lichtenberg; S J McPhee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Can standardized mortality ratio be used to compare quality of intensive care unit performance?

Authors:  O Boyd; M Grounds
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  The performance of intensive care units: does good management make a difference?

Authors:  S M Shortell; J E Zimmerman; D M Rousseau; R R Gillies; D P Wagner; E A Draper; W A Knaus; J Duffy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Efficiency of intensive care. A comparative analysis of eight pediatric intensive care units.

Authors:  M M Pollack; P R Getson; U E Ruttimann; C M Steinhart; R K Kanter; R W Katz; A R Zucker; N L Glass; W A Spohn; B P Fuhrman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-09-18       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Application of the APACHE III prognostic system in Brazilian intensive care units: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  P G Bastos; X Sun; D P Wagner; W A Knaus; J E Zimmerman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; D Teres; J Klar; J S Avrunin; S H Gehlbach; J Rapoport
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; H Bernard; J F O'Donnell; G Lukacik; E P Shields
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  A method for assessing the clinical performance and cost-effectiveness of intensive care units: a multicenter inception cohort study.

Authors:  J Rapoport; D Teres; S Lemeshow; S Gehlbach
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  21 in total

1.  Effects of a major structural change to the intensive care unit on the quality and outcome after intensive care.

Authors:  H Flaatten
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-08

2.  Emergency, anaesthetic and essential surgical capacity in the Gambia.

Authors:  Adam Iddriss; Nestor Shivute; Stephen Bickler; Ramou Cole-Ceesay; Bakary Jargo; Fizan Abdullah; Meena Cherian
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  ICU structures and organization: putting together all the pieces of a very complex puzzle.

Authors:  Andrew Rhodes; Rui P Moreno; Jean-Daniel Chiche
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Recommendations on basic requirements for intensive care units: structural and organizational aspects.

Authors:  Andreas Valentin; Patrick Ferdinande
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Use of the sequential organ failure assessment score as a severity score.

Authors:  André Carlos Kajdacsy-Balla Amaral; Fábio Moreira Andrade; Rui Moreno; Antonio Artigas; Francis Cantraine; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Is APACHE II a useful tool for clinical research?

Authors:  Rui P Moreno; Antonio Paulo Nassar
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

7.  Analysis of the effect of conversion from open to closed surgical intensive care unit.

Authors:  S Ghorra; S E Reinert; W Cioffi; G Buczko; H H Simms
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Global quantitative indices reflecting provider process-of-care: data-base derivation.

Authors:  John L Moran; Patricia J Solomon
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  More interventions do not necessarily improve outcome in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Philipp G H Metnitz; Ana Reiter; Barbara Jordan; Thomas Lang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The relationship between hospital volume and mortality in mechanical ventilation: an instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Thomas R Ten Have; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.