Literature DB >> 8844160

Epistatic control of non-Mendelian inheritance in mouse interspecific crosses.

X Montagutelli1, R Turner, J H Nadeau.   

Abstract

Strong deviation of allele frequencies from Mendelian inheritance favoring Mus spretus-derived alleles has been described previously for X-linked loci in four mouse interspecific crosses. We reanalyzed data for three of these crosses focusing on the location of the gene(s) controlling deviation on the X chromosome and the genetic basis for incomplete deviation. At least two loci control deviation on the X chromosome, one near Xist (the candidate gene controlling X inactivation) and the other more centromerically located. In all three crosses, strong epistasis was found between loci near Xist and marker loci on the central portion of chromosome 2. The mechanism for this deviation from Mendelian expectations is not yet known but it is probably based on lethality of embryos carrying particular combinations of alleles rather than true segregation distortion during oogenesis in F1 hybrid females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8844160      PMCID: PMC1207435     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  40 in total

1.  A genetic map of the mouse suitable for typing intraspecific crosses.

Authors:  W Dietrich; H Katz; S E Lincoln; H S Shin; J Friedman; N C Dracopoli; E S Lander
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Maintaining Mendelism: might prevention be better than cure?

Authors:  L D Hurst; A Pomiankowski
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive.

Authors:  D Haig; A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Effect of sperm genotype on chromatid segregation in female mice heterozygous for aberrant chromosome 1.

Authors:  S I Agulnik; I D Sabantsev; A O Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development.

Authors:  G F Kay; S C Barton; M A Surani; S Rastan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Meiotic drive on aberrant chromosome 1 in the mouse is determined by a linked distorter.

Authors:  S I Agulnik; I D Sabantsev; G V Orlova; A O Ruvinsky
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Segregation distortion of X-linked marker genes in interspecific crosses between Mus musculus and M. spretus.

Authors:  F G Biddle
Journal:  Genome       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.166

9.  A molecular genetic linkage map of mouse chromosome 7.

Authors:  A M Saunders; M F Seldin
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  An X-chromosome linked locus contributes to abnormal placental development in mouse interspecific hybrid.

Authors:  U Zechner; M Reule; A Orth; F Bonhomme; B Strack; H Hameister; R Fundele
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  20 in total

1.  A genetic test to determine the origin of maternal transmission ratio distortion. Meiotic drive at the mouse Om locus.

Authors:  F Pardo-Manuel de Villena; E de la Casa-Esperon; T L Briscoe; C Sapienza
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A large-sample QTL study in mice: III. Reproduction.

Authors:  Joao L Rocha; Eugene J Eisen; Frank Siewerdt; L Dale Van Vleck; Daniel Pomp
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Allison Cox; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Beth L Dumont; Yueming Ding; Jordana Tzenova Bell; Gudrun A Brockmann; Jon E Wergedal; Carol Bult; Beverly Paigen; Jonathan Flint; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Gary A Churchill; Karl W Broman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Construction of a high-resolution genetic map encompassing the hotfoot locus.

Authors:  A Lalouette; E Christians; J L Guénet; S Vriz
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Parental origin-dependent, male offspring-specific transmission-ratio distortion at loci on the human X chromosome.

Authors:  A K Naumova; M Leppert; D F Barker; K Morgan; C Sapienza
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Genome scans for transmission ratio distortion regions in mice.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Rodrigo J Gularte; Charles R Farber; Luis Varona; Margarete Mehrabian; Eric E Schadt; Aldon J Lusis; Alan D Attie; Brian S Yandell; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A flexible bayesian model for testing for transmission ratio distortion.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Arianna Manunza; Anna Mercader; Raquel Quintanilla; Marcel Amills
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Do Gametes Woo? Evidence for Their Nonrandom Union at Fertilization.

Authors:  Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic and developmental analysis of X-inactivation in interspecific hybrid mice suggests a role for the Y chromosome in placental dysplasia.

Authors:  M Hemberger; H Kurz; A Orth; S Otto; A Lüttges; R Elliott; A Nagy; S S Tan; P Tam; U Zechner; R H Fundele
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic mapping and developmental timing of transmission ratio distortion in a mouse interspecific backcross.

Authors:  Chevonne D Eversley; Tavia Clark; Yuying Xie; Jill Steigerwalt; Timothy A Bell; Fernando P M de Villena; David W Threadgill
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.