Literature DB >> 8842502

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of metoprolol and carvedilol in hypertensive patients.

K Weber1, T Bohmeke, R van der Does, S H Taylor.   

Abstract

Metoprolol and carvedilol are widely used in the treatment of hypertension, but no randomized comparison of their hemodynamic activity has been previously reported. Their comparative effects on heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and echocardiographically determined aortic and femoral artery blood flow were measured at rest and at 2 and 24 hours after the first dose of each drug, and again after 4 weeks of sustained monotherapy in 12 male and 12 female patients, aged 36-68 years with uncomplicated sustained hypertension according to a randomized single-blind protocol. Nine patients in each drug group achieved the target diastolic blood pressure of < 90 mmHg on the initial doses of each drug; this was achieved in the remainder following doubling of each dose. Neither drug occasioned withdrawal of any patient due to adverse reactions. Both drugs significantly reduced heart rate, although the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after metoprolol than after carvedilol. Both drugs reduced systolic pressure throughout the study; the reduction at 2 hours was significantly greater after carvedilol than after metoprolol. In contrast, the diastolic blood pressure was persistently reduced only by carvedilol. The cardiac output, determined as the aortic systolic blood flow, after carvedilol was not significantly different from pretreatment values throughout the study but was significantly reduced in the metoprolol-treated patients at each point of measurement. After metoprolol the systemic and femoral vascular resistances derived from conventional formulae were consistently and significantly increased over pretreatment values throughout the study and were significantly greater than in the carvedilol group at all measurement points. The hemodynamic differences between these two beta-blocking drugs may be explained by the additional vasodilator activity of carvedilol associated with its alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocking activity. The long-term clinical and prognostic implications of these pharmacodynamic differences between beta-adrenoceptor antagonists with and without additional vasodilator activity in the treatment of hypertensive patients remain to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8842502     DOI: 10.1007/bf00823588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther        ISSN: 0920-3206            Impact factor:   3.727


  14 in total

1.  Treatment of chronic stable angina with carvedilol in comparison with nifedipine s.r.

Authors:  R van der Does; R Eberhardt; I Derr; B Ehmer; J Rudorf; H J Uberbacher
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Acute and chronic hemodynamic effects of drugs with different actions on adrenergic receptors: a comparison between alpha blockers and different types of beta blockers with and without vasodilating effect.

Authors:  P Lund-Johansen; P Omvik
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  Antihypertensive profile of carvedilol.

Authors:  W Meyer-Sabellek; B Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992

4.  The Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study: prevalence and prognostic significance of hyperlipidemia in men with systemic hypertension.

Authors:  G Assmann; H Schulte
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1987-05-29       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Carvedilol in hypertension: effects on hemodynamics and 24-hour blood pressure.

Authors:  P Lund-Johansen; P Omvik; J E Nordrehaug; W White
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 6.  Experimental and clinical pharmacology of carvedilol and other drugs combining vasodilation and beta-adrenoceptor antagonism in a single molecule.

Authors:  K Strein; G Sponer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  1990

7.  Mortality in patients of the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic.

Authors:  C G Isles; L M Walker; G D Beevers; I Brown; H L Cameron; J Clarke; V Hawthorne; D Hole; A F Lever; J W Robertson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Haemodynamic advantages of combined alpha-blockade and beta-blockade over beta-blockade alone in patients with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  S H Taylor; B Silke; G I Nelson; R C Okoli; R C Ahuja
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-07-31

9.  Hypertension. Relationship with other risk factors.

Authors:  W B Kannel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.

Authors:  R Collins; R Peto; S MacMahon; P Hebert; N H Fiebach; K A Eberlein; J Godwin; N Qizilbash; J O Taylor; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-04-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Carvedilol. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A P Lea; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.