Literature DB >> 8841645

A technique for measuring epidemiologically useful features of birthweight distributions.

D M Umbach1, A J Wilcox.   

Abstract

Birthweight distributions have been conceptualized as a predominant Gaussian distribution contaminated in the tails by an unspecified 'residual' distribution. Acknowledging this idea, we propose a technique for measuring certain features of birthweight distributions useful to epidemiologists: the mean and variance of the predominant distribution; the proportions of births in the low- and high-birthweight residual distributions, and the boundaries of support for these residual distributions. Our technique, based on an underlying multinomial sampling distribution, involves estimating parameters in a mixture model for the multinomial bin probabilities after having chosen the support of the residual distribution with a model selection criterion. A modest simulation study and experience with a few actual datasets indicate that use of a Bayesian information criterion (BIC) as model selection criterion is superior to use of Akaike's information criterion (AIC) in this application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8841645     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1333::AID-SIM271>3.0.CO;2-R

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Unit conversion as a source of misclassification in US birthweight data.

Authors:  D M Umbach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Investigating causal relation between prenatal arsenic exposure and birthweight: Are smaller infants more susceptible?

Authors:  Mohammad L Rahman; Linda Valeri; Molly L Kile; Maitreyi Mazumdar; Golam Mostofa; Qazi Qamruzzaman; Mahmudur Rahman; Andrea Baccarelli; Liming Liang; Russ Hauser; David C Christiani
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Sex-specific associations of maternal birthweight with offspring birthweight in the Omega study.

Authors:  Collette N Ncube; Amelia R Gavin; Michelle A Williams; Chunfang Qiu; Tanya K Sorensen; Daniel A Enquobahrie
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Thinking outside the curve, part II: modeling fetal-infant mortality.

Authors:  Richard Charnigo; Lorie W Chesnut; Tony Lobianco; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Thinking outside the curve, part I: modeling birthweight distribution.

Authors:  Richard Charnigo; Lorie W Chesnut; Tony Lobianco; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  New Insights into Signed Path Coefficient Granger Causality Analysis.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Chong Li; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Validation of MINORMIX Approach for Estimation of Low Birthweight Prevalence Using a Rural Nepal Dataset.

Authors:  Karen T Chang; Emily D Carter; Luke C Mullany; Subarna K Khatry; Simon Cousens; Xiaoyi An; Julia Krasevec; Steven C LeClerq; Melinda K Munos; Joanne Katz
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Maternal age and infant mortality: a test of the Wilcox-Russell hypothesis.

Authors:  Timothy B Gage; Fu Fang; Erin O'Neill; Howard Stratton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Analysis of neonatal mortality:is standardizing for relative birth weight biased?

Authors:  Robert W Platt; Cande V Ananth; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.