Literature DB >> 10630152

Unit conversion as a source of misclassification in US birthweight data.

D M Umbach1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study explains why frequency polygons for US birthweights in 100-g weight classes appear spiky compared with their European counterparts.
METHODS: A probability model is used to describe how unit conversion can induce misclassification. Birthweights from the United States and Norway are used to illustrate that misclassification operates in grouped US data.
RESULTS: Spikiness represents misclassification that arises when measured birthweights are rounded to the nearer ounce, converted to grams, and then grouped into weight classes. Misclassification is ameliorated, not eliminated, with 200-g weight classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Possible biases from misclassification should be carefully evaluated when fitting statistical models to grouped US birthweights.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10630152      PMCID: PMC1446123          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.1.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  The 1989 revision of the U.S. Standard Certificates and Reports.

Authors:  G C Tolson; J M Barnes; G A Gay; J L Kowaleski
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 4       Date:  1991-06

2.  A technique for measuring epidemiologically useful features of birthweight distributions.

Authors:  D M Umbach; A J Wilcox
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  High birthweights among infants of north African immigrants in Belgium.

Authors:  P Buekens; G Masuy-Stroobant; T Delvaux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Variability of birth-weight distributions by sex and ethnicity: analysis using mixture models.

Authors:  T B Gage; G Therriault
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  Birth-weight-adjusted infant mortality in evaluations of perinatal care: towards a useful summary measure.

Authors:  J L Kiely; J C Kleinman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Birthweight and perinatal mortality: I. On the frequency distribution of birthweight.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; I T Russell
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 7.196

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Measuring birth weight in developing countries: does the method of reporting in retrospective surveys matter?

Authors:  Andrew A R Channon; Sabu S Padmadas; John W McDonald
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01

2.  Birthweight measurement processes and perceived value: qualitative research in one EN-BIRTH study hospital in Tanzania.

Authors:  Miriam E Gladstone; Nahya Salim; Karama Ogillo; Donat Shamba; Georgia R Gore-Langton; Louise T Day; Hannah Blencowe; Joy E Lawn
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.