Literature DB >> 8839121

Event-related potentials as indirect measures of recognition memory.

J C van Hooff1, C H Brunia, J J Allen.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during an auditory word-recognition task to determine whether they can be used as indirect measures of recognition memory, defined as the ability to differentiate learned from unlearned material when no overt recognition response from the subject is required. A modified version of the two-choice reaction time task developed by Allen, Iacono and Danielson (Allen et al., 1992) was used. In three recognition tasks, administered on two consecutive days, subjects were instructed to indicate recognition of recently learned words. These words were presented along with unlearned words and along with previously learned words which both required a non-recognition response. Recently learned target words as well as previously learned nontarget words elicited a centro-parietal positivity around 500-1000 ms post-stimulus. The size and onset of this late positivity (P300) were affected by the requirement of an overt recognition response. The results suggest that ERPs are sensitive to differences between learned and unlearned words, to some extent independently of the behavioral response. ERPs may therefore be used as indirect measures of recognition memory. In addition, because the present results held for stimuli presented in the auditory modality and because recognition indices were still observed after a one-day interval between learning and testing, this procedure might prove useful in various applications when the integrity of memory is in question.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8839121     DOI: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00043-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  8 in total

1.  Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Henry T Greely; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Objective assessment of cognitive factors involved in visceral perception by using event-related cerebral evoked responses to esophageal target stimulation in man.

Authors:  S Hollerbach; A May; M V Kamath; G Shine; A R Upton; G Tougas
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Olga Klimecki; Thomas Bauermann; Peter Stoeter; Gerhard Vossel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  P300 amplitudes in the concealed information test are less affected by depth of processing than electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Preservation of auditory P300-like potentials in cortical deafness.

Authors:  Marianna Cavinato; Jessica Rigon; Chiara Volpato; Carlo Semenza; Francesco Piccione
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intentional retrieval suppression can conceal guilty knowledge in ERP memory detection tests.

Authors:  Zara M Bergström; Michael C Anderson; Marie Buda; Jon S Simons; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.