Literature DB >> 19258375

fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects.

Matthias Gamer1, Olga Klimecki, Thomas Bauermann, Peter Stoeter, Gerhard Vossel.   

Abstract

Recent research on potential applications of fMRI in the detection of concealed knowledge primarily ascribed the reported differences in hemodynamic response patterns to deception. This interpretation is challenged by the results of the present study. Participants were required to memorize probe and target items (a banknote and a playing card, each). Subsequently, these items were repeatedly presented along with eight irrelevant items in a modified Guilty Knowledge Test design and participants were instructed to simply acknowledge item presentation by pressing one button after each stimulus. Despite the absence of response monitoring demands and thus overt response conflicts, the experiment revealed a differential physiological response pattern as a function of item type. First, probes elicited the largest skin conductance responses. Second, differential hemodynamic responses were observed in bilateral inferior frontal regions, the right supramarginal gyrus and the supplementary motor area as a function of item type. Probes and targets were accompanied by a larger signal increase than irrelevant items in these regions. Moreover, the responses to probes differed substantially from targets. The observed neural response pattern seems to rely on retrieval processes that depend on the depth of processing in the encoding situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258375      PMCID: PMC3375883          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsp005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  53 in total

1.  Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  K A Kiehl; K R Laurens; T L Duty; B B Forster; P F Liddle
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks.

Authors:  D E Linden; D Prvulovic; E Formisano; M Völlinger; F E Zanella; R Goebel; T Dierks
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment.

Authors:  J Downar; A P Crawley; D J Mikulis; K D Davis
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite efforts to conceal.

Authors:  L A Farwell; S S Smith
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 5.  Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies.

Authors:  M D'Esposito; B R Postle; B Rypma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors.

Authors:  T S Braver; D M Barch; J R Gray; D L Molfese; A Snyder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: the effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate.

Authors:  H W Gödert; H G Rill; G Vossel
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Brain mechanisms for detecting perceptual, semantic, and emotional deviance.

Authors:  B A Strange; R N Henson; K J Friston; R J Dolan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder.

Authors:  A Raine; T Lencz; S Bihrle; L LaCasse; P Colletti
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-02

10.  Neural correlates of episodic retrieval success.

Authors:  S Konishi; M E Wheeler; D I Donaldson; R L Buckner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  14 in total

1.  The effect of mental countermeasures on neuroimaging-based concealed information tests.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Hsu; Chiara Begliomini; Tommaso Dall'Acqua; Giorgio Ganis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional MRI-based lie detection: scientific and societal challenges.

Authors:  Martha J Farah; J Benjamin Hutchinson; Elizabeth A Phelps; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Manipulating item proportion and deception reveals crucial dissociation between behavioral, autonomic, and neural indices of concealed information.

Authors:  Kristina Suchotzki; Bruno Verschuere; Judith Peth; Geert Crombez; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating.

Authors:  Benjamin J Levy; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  "I know you can hear me": neural correlates of feigned hearing loss.

Authors:  Bradley McPherson; Katie McMahon; Wayne Wilson; David Copland
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Xiaoqing Gao; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The neural correlates of identity faking and concealment: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Xiao Pan Ding; Xiaoxia Du; Du Lei; Chao Super Hu; Genyue Fu; Guopeng Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  P300 amplitudes in the concealed information test are less affected by depth of processing than electrodermal responses.

Authors:  Matthias Gamer; Stefan Berti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  When Pinocchio's nose does not grow: belief regarding lie-detectability modulates production of deception.

Authors:  Kamila E Sip; David Carmel; Jennifer L Marchant; Jian Li; Predrag Petrovic; Andreas Roepstorff; William B McGregor; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.