Literature DB >> 3254644

Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues.

S Shechter1, S Hochstein, P Hillman.   

Abstract

Apparent motion is perceived when two spots of light are presented successively in different locations. When more than one element is present in each frame, there is a correspondence problem in matching the elements in one frame with those in the other. We report the effects of shape similarity and distance disparity on the correspondence process. Twenty subjects were tested using a 2-AFC design. We found that both shape and distance cues are used by the correspondence process: when distance is the only cue the motion which is usually perceived is that involving the shorter distance; when shape is the only cue the motion involving two elements of the same shape is preferred. We also studied the interaction between the two cues when both were present. Quantitative measures of the relative strengths of these effects and of their interaction are reported. A Signal Detection Theory model is used to analyze these apparent motion correspondence effects.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3254644     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90078-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

2.  Effects of element orientation on apparent motion perception.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

3.  Magnitude of luminance modulation specifies amplitude of perceived movement.

Authors:  J Allik; A Pulver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

4.  Spatio-temporal priority revisited: the role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Object correspondence: Using perceived causality to infer how the visual system knows what went where.

Authors:  Cathleen M Moore; Teresa Stephens; Elisabeth Hein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Auditory motion capturing ambiguous visual motion.

Authors:  Arjen Alink; Felix Euler; Elena Galeano; Alexandra Krugliak; Wolf Singer; Axel Kohler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-01-02

7.  Visual working memory content influences correspondence processes.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hein; Madeleine Y Stepper; Andrew Hollingworth; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.077

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.