Literature DB >> 8837785

Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment.

A J Bosman1, G F Smoorenburg.   

Abstract

Both meaningful (sense) and meaningless (nonsense) syllables of the consonant-vowel-consonant type (CVC syllables) and short sentences consisting of 8 or 9 syllables were presented in quiet and in noise to 20 young subjects with normal hearing and to three groups of 20 subjects each with presbycusis, with Menière's disease and with noise-induced hearing loss. All materials were uttered by a female speaker. The masking noise consisted of continuous noise shaped in accordance with the long-term average spectrum of the speaker. For each individual, the level of the noise was chosen halfway between the speech reception threshold (SRT) for sentences in quiet and 100 dBA. For all groups of subjects in quiet, the SRT for whole-sentence correct scores (sentence SRT) corresponded closely to the SRT for phoneme scores with sense CVC syllables in quiet (CVC phoneme SRT). Averaged across all groups of subjects, sentence SRT in quiet could be predicted within 4.2 dB from CVC phoneme SRT in quiet and sentence SRT in noise within 1.8 dB from CVC phoneme SRT in noise. The prediction error for sentence SRT in quiet using the pure-tone average (PTA) of 0.5, 1 and 2 kHz was 6.0 dB; for sentence SRT in noise using the PTA of 2 and 4 kHz, it was 2.1 dB. In view of the smaller measurement error, a direct measurement of sentence SRT in noise is advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8837785     DOI: 10.3109/00206099509071918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  38 in total

1.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Johan H M Frijns; Jakob Geleijns; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Threshold levels of dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jorien Snel-Bongers; Jeroen J Briaire; Erika H van der Veen; Randy K Kalkman; Johan H M Frijns
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-22

3.  Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults: A Detailed Analysis of Auditory and Self-Perceived Benefits.

Authors:  Joke Debruyne; Miranda Janssen; Jan Brokx
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Jantien L Vroegop; Nienke C Homans; André Goedegebure; J Gertjan Dingemanse; Teun van Immerzeel; Marc P van der Schroeff
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; Etienne Gaudrain; Jeanne N Clarke; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-30

6.  Musician effect in cochlear implant simulated gender categorization.

Authors:  Christina D Fuller; John J Galvin; Rolien H Free; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Audiological evaluation of affected members from a Dutch DFNA8/12 (TECTA) family.

Authors:  Rutger F Plantinga; Cor W R J Cremers; Patrick L M Huygen; Henricus P M Kunst; Arjan J Bosman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-11-30

8.  Lexical access in children with hearing loss or specific language impairment, using the cross-modal picture-word interference paradigm.

Authors:  Brigitte E de Hoog; Margreet C Langereis; Marjolijn van Weerdenburg; Harry Knoors; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2014-11-26

9.  Hyperacusis in patients with complex regional pain syndrome related dystonia.

Authors:  M J M de Klaver; M A van Rijn; J Marinus; W Soede; J A P M de Laat; J J van Hilten
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Similar phenotypes caused by mutations in OTOG and OTOGL.

Authors:  Anne M M Oonk; Joop M Leijendeckers; Patrick L M Huygen; Margit Schraders; Miguel del Campo; Ignacio del Castillo; Mustafa Tekin; Ilse Feenstra; Andy J Beynon; Henricus P M Kunst; Ad F M Snik; Hannie Kremer; Ronald J C Admiraal; Ronald J E Pennings
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.