Literature DB >> 8836980

Interictal cortical hyperexcitability in migraine patients demonstrated with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

W van der Kamp1, A Maassen VanDenBrink, M D Ferrari, J G van Dijk.   

Abstract

Cortical excitability to magnetic stimulation was investigated interictally in 10 patients with migraine with aura, 10 with migraine without aura and in 10 healthy volunteers. Thresholds, latencies and amplitudes of the magnetic-evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from threshold to 100% stimulus intensity in 10% steps. Compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) evoked with supramaximal electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve were used to calculate MEP/CMAP amplitude ratios. Thresholds and latencies of MEPs did not differ between patients and controls. MEP/CMAP amplitude ratios were significantly increased at all intensities in patients with migraine with aura (RM-ANOVA, p < 0.01) and without aura (p < 0.05) compared with controls. In migraine patients, MEP amplitudes and MEP/CMAP amplitude ratios were positively related to the frequency of migraine attacks (Spearman's r = 0.47, p < 0.01 and r = 0.56, p < 0.002, respectively). MEP parameters were not related to the side of the headache nor the aura, in either type of migraine, implying that both hemispheres are equally involved in migraine. Migraine with aura and, to a lesser extent, migraine without aura, are associated with increased interictal cortical excitability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836980     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(96)00044-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  16 in total

1.  Long term decline of P100 amplitude in migraine with aura.

Authors:  N M Khalil; N J Legg; D J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Altered functional magnetic resonance imaging resting-state connectivity in periaqueductal gray networks in migraine.

Authors:  Caterina Mainero; Jasmine Boshyan; Nouchine Hadjikhani
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 3.  Central mechanism of action of antimigraine prophylactic drugs.

Authors:  Gerardo Casucci; Veronica Villani; Fabio Frediani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Saccadic oscillations - membrane, model, and medicine.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10

Review 5.  Pathophysiology of migraine headache.

Authors:  S K Aurora
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-04

Review 6.  Chronic disorders with episodic manifestations: focus on epilepsy and migraine.

Authors:  Sheryl R Haut; Marcelo E Bigal; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Facilitatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS in motor cortex of patients affected by migraine with aura.

Authors:  Filippo Brighina; Giuseppe Giglia; Simona Scalia; Margherita Francolini; Antonio Palermo; Brigida Fierro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Saccadic burst cell membrane dysfunction is responsible for saccadic oscillations.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Stefano Ramat; Lance M Optican; Kenichiro Miura; R John Leigh; David S Zee
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Migraine is associated with altered processing of sensory stimuli.

Authors:  Andrea M Harriott; Todd J Schwedt
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-11

Review 10.  Update on the genetics of migraine.

Authors:  Miguel Estevez; Kathy L Gardner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.