Literature DB >> 8836840

Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing.

E W Fritsch1.   

Abstract

With the objectives of reducing toxicity and improving the mechanical properties of the prior Sulfix-6 cement, a new low-viscosity bone cement with a new catalyst (Sulfix-60), and a gentamycin containing cement (Allofix-G) were developed. Although static strength could be improved in comparison with the older Sulfix-6 cement, investigations regarding improved fatigue strength and the influence of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties were missing. Dynamic weakness was the major disadvantage of the older Sulfix-6 cement. To investigate fatigue strength specimens of the new bone cements were tested with load guiding until breakage or 20 million cycles. In the three series, hand mixing, vacuum mixing, and vacuum mixing with additional pressurization were performed, respectively. Vacuum mixing led to increased fatigue stability from 6.3 to 9.1 MPa for Sulfix-60, and from 6.3 to 8.2 MPa for Allofix-G. Additional compression had no significant effect. A 200% increased fatigue strength was detectable in comparison with the older cement. In the four-point bending test, similar results were found. It could be proved that an increased polymerization rate achieved with the use of the new catalyst was responsible for the improved mechanical properties of the new bone cement Sulfix-60.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836840     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199608)31:4<451::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-K

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Biological response of new activated acrylic bone cements with antiseptic properties. Histomorphometric analysis.

Authors:  B de la Torre; M Salvado; M A González Corchón; B Vázquez; F Collía; J A De Pedro; J San Román
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.727

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.