Literature DB >> 8834861

Ingestion, inhalation, and dermal exposures to chloroform and trichloroethene from tap water.

C P Weisel1, W K Jo.   

Abstract

Individuals are exposed to volatile compounds present in tap water by ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption. Traditional risk assessments for water often only consider ingestion exposure to toxic chemicals, even though showering has been shown to increase the body burden of certain chemicals due to inhalation exposure and dermal absorption. We collected and analyzed time-series samples of expired alveolar breath to evaluate changes in concentrations of volatile organic compounds being expired, which reflects the rate of change in the bloodstream due to expiration, metabolism, and absorption into tissues. Analysis of chloroform and trichloethene in expired breath, compounds regulated in water, was also used to determine uptake from tap water by each route (inhalation, ingestion, or absorption). Each route of exposure contributed to the total exposure of these compounds from daily water use. Further, the ingestion dose was completely metabolized before entering the bloodstream, whereas the dose from the other routes was dispersed throughout the body. Thus, differences in potential biologically effective doses depend on route, target organ, and whether the contaminant or metabolite is the biologically active agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8834861      PMCID: PMC1469238          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9610448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  14 in total

1.  Pulmonary elimination of chloroform and its metabolite in man.

Authors:  B J Fry; T Taylor; D E Hathway
Journal:  Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther       Date:  1972-03

2.  Public drinking water contamination and birth outcomes.

Authors:  F J Bove; M C Fulcomer; J B Klotz; J Esmart; E M Dufficy; J E Savrin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Linking a PBPK model for chloroform with measured breath concentrations in showers: implications for dermal exposure models.

Authors:  T E McKone
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1993 Jul-Sep

4.  Case-control study of bladder cancer and water disinfection methods in Colorado.

Authors:  M A McGeehin; J S Reif; J C Becher; E J Mangione
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Chloroform: a review of its metabolism, teratogenic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic potential.

Authors:  I W Davidson; D D Sumner; J C Parker
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.356

6.  Inhalation exposure in the home to volatile organic contaminants of drinking water.

Authors:  J B Andelman
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Trihalomethanes and maximum contaminant levels: the significance of inhalation and dermal exposures to chloroform in household water.

Authors:  N I Maxwell; D E Burmaster; D Ozonoff
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  The association of waterborne chloroform with intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  M D Kramer; C F Lynch; P Isacson; J W Hanson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Elimination of volatile organic compounds in breath after exposure to occupational and environmental microenvironments.

Authors:  J H Raymer; E D Pellizzari; K W Thomas; S D Cooper
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1991-10

10.  A linear model relating breath concentrations to environmental exposures: application to a chamber study of four volunteers exposed to volatile organic chemicals.

Authors:  L Wallace; E Pellizzari; S Gordon
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar
View more
  32 in total

1.  Total trihalomethanes in public drinking water supply and birth outcomes: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sanjaya Kumar; Steve Forand; Gwen Babcock; Wayne Richter; Thomas Hart; Syni-An Hwang
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

2.  Prenatal exposure to drinking-water chlorination by-products, cytochrome P450 gene polymorphisms and small-for-gestational-age neonates.

Authors:  Samuella G Bonou; Patrick Levallois; Yves Giguère; Manuel Rodriguez; Alexandre Bureau
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Percutaneous absorption of haloacetonitriles and chloral hydrate and simulated human exposures.

Authors:  Maria Trabaris; Jeffrey D Laskin; Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 4.  Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review.

Authors:  M J Nieuwenhuijsen; M B Toledano; N E Eaton; J Fawell; P Elliott
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Limitations and plausibility of the Pliocene lignite hypothesis in explaining the etiology of Balkan endemic nephropathy.

Authors:  S V M Maharaj
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

6.  Effects of temperature, surfactants and skin location on the dermal penetration of haloacetonitriles and chloral hydrate.

Authors:  Maria Trabaris; Jeffrey D Laskin; Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 5.563

7.  Multi-route risk assessment from trihalomethanes in drinking water supplies.

Authors:  Mrittika Basu; Sunil Kumar Gupta; Gurdeep Singh; Ujjal Mukhopadhyay
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Distribution and determinants of trihalomethane concentrations in indoor swimming pools.

Authors:  H Chu; M J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Risk assessment of trihalomethanes from tap water in Fortaleza, Brazil.

Authors:  Rommel B Viana; Rivelino M Cavalcante; Fuad M G Braga; Anderson B Viana; José C de Araujo; Ronaldo F Nascimento; André S Pimentel
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Whole-house arsenic water treatment provided more effective arsenic exposure reduction than point-of-use water treatment at New Jersey homes with arsenic in well water.

Authors:  Steven E Spayd; Mark G Robson; Brian T Buckley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.