Literature DB >> 1771271

Trihalomethanes and maximum contaminant levels: the significance of inhalation and dermal exposures to chloroform in household water.

N I Maxwell1, D E Burmaster, D Ozonoff.   

Abstract

Our review of the literature on the importance of inhalation and dermal exposures to volatile organic compounds in household water relative to ingestion exposures sought to answer two questions. First, how well do the inhalation and dermal doses predicted by simple models, complex simulations, and measurements agree with one another? And second, what are the implications for the cancer risk from chloroform in household water? The literature yields a coherent and credible range of dose estimates: the ratio of lifetime inhalation dose to lifetime ingestion dose is probably in the range of approximately 0.6 to approximately 1.5, but may be as high as approximately 5.7; and the ratio of lifetime dermal dose to lifetime ingestion dose is probably about approximately 0.3, but may be as high as approximately 1.8. However, because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Cancer Potency Factor (CPF) for inhalation of chloroform is much higher than the CPF for ingestion, the ratios of incremental lifetime cancer risk from inhalation of chloroform to risk from ingestion are much larger than the corresponding ratios for dose. The incremental lifetime cancer risk from chloroform by all three pathways is probably approximately 9 to approximately 21 times the ingestion risk and may be as much as approximately 79 times the ingestion risk. As the EPA reviews the drinking water standard for total trihalomethanes, it is essential that the Agency take account of all exposure pathways in estimating cancer risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1771271     DOI: 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90032-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  9 in total

Review 1.  Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review.

Authors:  M J Nieuwenhuijsen; M B Toledano; N E Eaton; J Fawell; P Elliott
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Green chemistry in protected horticulture: the use of peroxyacetic acid as a sustainable strategy.

Authors:  Gilda Carrasco; Miguel Urrestarazu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Assessing exposure to disinfection by-products in women of reproductive age living in Corpus Christi, Texas, and Cobb county, Georgia: descriptive results and methods.

Authors:  M Lynberg; J R Nuckols; P Langlois; D Ashley; P Singer; P Mendola; C Wilkes; H Krapfl; E Miles; V Speight; B Lin; L Small; A Miles; M Bonin; P Zeitz; A Tadkod; J Henry; M B Forrester
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Ingestion, inhalation, and dermal exposures to chloroform and trichloroethene from tap water.

Authors:  C P Weisel; W K Jo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Reproductive and developmental effects of disinfection by-products in drinking water.

Authors:  J S Reif; M C Hatch; M Bracken; L B Holmes; B A Schwetz; P C Singer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Changes in blood lead levels associated with use of chloramines in water treatment systems.

Authors:  Marie Lynn Miranda; Dohyeong Kim; Andrew P Hull; Christopher J Paul; M Alicia Overstreet Galeano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Approaches to environmental exposure assessment in children.

Authors:  V M Weaver; T J Buckley; J D Groopman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Colon and rectal cancer incidence and water trihalomethane concentrations in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Md Bayzidur Rahman; Christine Cowie; Tim Driscoll; Richard J Summerhayes; Bruce K Armstrong; Mark S Clements
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Human health risk analysis from disinfection by-products (DBPs) in drinking and bathing water of some Indian cities.

Authors:  Brijesh Kumar Mishra; Sunil Kumar Gupta; Alok Sinha
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2014-04-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.