Literature DB >> 2000642

Correlation of hepatocellular proliferation with hepatocarcinogenicity induced by the mutagenic noncarcinogen:carcinogen pair--2,6- and 2,4-diaminotoluene.

M L Cunningham1, J Foley, R R Maronpot, H B Matthews.   

Abstract

2,4-Diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT) and 2,6-diaminotoluene (2,6-DAT) are equally genotoxic in the Ames/Salmonella assay and are both readily absorbed, metabolized, and excreted and metabolites of both compounds are mutagenic with metabolic activation. However, there are marked differences in the results of chronic rodent bioassays with these two compounds. 2,4-DAT is a potent hepatocarcinogen whereas 2,6-DAT failed to produce an increased incidence of tumors in any tissue even when administered at a dose higher than that of 2,4-DAT. In an effort to elucidate the source of these apparently discordant results, the present studies were designed to determine the effects of these two chemicals on cell proliferation in the liver when administered at the dose levels comparable to those used in the original bioassays. This study utilized repeated oral dosing, osmotic minipumps to deliver bromodeoxyuridine (BrDU) for 8 days, and immunohistochemistry to quantitate BrDU incorporation into hepatic DNA, CCl4 (0.4 ml/rat, single ip dose) or vehicle control groups were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. The degree of cell proliferation was quantified by the labeling index from at least 1000 hepatocytes. Results from the control studies indicate that approximately 1.1% of the hepatocytes from vehicle-treated animals replicated during the exposure period whereas approximately 50% replicated in the positive controls. The carcinogen 2,4-DAT produced a dose-dependent increase in cell proliferation of approximately 10% and 20% in livers of animals exposed to 12.5 and 25.0 mg/kg/day, respectively, whereas the noncarcinogen 2,6-DAT produced no increase in cell turnover compared to vehicle control following treatment with 25.0 or 50.0 mg/kg/day. These results indicate a positive correlation between increased cell proliferation and hepatocarcinogenesis induced by these two isomers of diaminetoluene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2000642     DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(91)90319-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  15 in total

Review 1.  Drug toxicokinetics: scope and limitations that arise from species differences in pharmacodynamic and carcinogenic responses.

Authors:  A Monro
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-02

2.  Evaluation of electrochemiluminescent metabolic toxicity screening arrays using a multiple compound set.

Authors:  Shenmin Pan; Linlin Zhao; John B Schenkman; James F Rusling
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Formation and removal of DNA adducts in Fischer-344 rats exposed to 2,4-diaminotoluene.

Authors:  D K La; J R Froines
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Assessment of the influence of subacute phenobarbitone administration on multi-tissue cell proliferation in the rat using bromodeoxyuridine immunocytochemistry.

Authors:  H B Jones; N A Clarke
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Concordance between Results of Medium-term Liver Carcinogenesis Bioassays and Long-term Findings for Carcinogenic 2-Nitropropane and Non-carcinogenic1-Nitropropane in F344 Rats.

Authors:  Yuko Doi; Seiko Tamano; Mayumi Kawabe; Masashi Sano; Norio Imai; Hironao Nakashima; Fumio Furukawa; Akihiro Hagiwara; Masanori Otsuka; Tomoyuki Shirai
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Distinction of mutagenic carcinogens from a mutagenic noncarcinogen in the big blue transgenic mouse.

Authors:  M L Cunningham; J J Hayward; B S Shane; K R Tindall
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  The causes and prevention of cancer: gaining perspective.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  DNA lesions, inducible DNA repair, and cell division: three key factors in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  B N Ames; M K Shigenaga; L S Gold
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Statistical Comparison of Carcinogenic Effects and Dose-Response Relationships in Rats and Mice for 2,4-Toluene Diamine to those Ascribed to Toluene Diisocyanate.

Authors:  Robert L Sielken; Robert S Bretzlaff; Ciriaco Valdez-Flores; Ralph Parod
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 5.190

Review 10.  Anomalous nonidentity between Salmonella genotoxicants and rodent carcinogens: nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens.

Authors:  K Yoshikawa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.