Literature DB >> 8833728

Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

E M McDougall1, R V Clayman.   

Abstract

We report our experience with the transperitoneal (TP) and retroperitoneal (RP) approaches for performing laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease. Thirty-three patients with benign renal disease underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy, 23 by the TP and 10 by the RP approach. The average age of the patient, ASA score, and specimen weight were similar for the two groups. The average operating time for the TP approach was 5.6 hours v 5 hours for the RP approach. The average hospital stay was 2.8 and 3 days for TP and RP groups, respectively. The use of postoperative analgesics was similar in the two groups (37 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent v 39 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent for the TP and RP groups, respectively). However, the RP group required less time to resume normal oral intake than the TP group (0.3 v 0.6 days). When assessed according to specimen weight of 100 or less, there was a significant reduction in the postoperative analgesia requirements for the RP group of patients (11 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent v 28 mg of morphine sulfate equivalent for the TP group). In this subgroup of patients, the resumption of oral intake also occurred more quickly in the RP than the TP group (0.4 v 0.5 days). The hospital stay and total convalescence time were similar for the two groups. Four complications occurred in the 33 patients: 2 patients (1 TP and 1 RP), required conversion to open surgery, 1 asthenic patient developed a vastus lateralis bruise undergoing a TP approach, and a brachial nerve palsy occurred in a morbidly obese patient who failed a TP approach. The RP approach to laparoscopic nephrectomy reduces the time to resuming normal oral intake for patients postoperatively and, in those patients with a small specimen, may significantly reduce their postoperative analgesia requirements. However, the RP approach for laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease does not significantly improve the length of hospital stay or the patient's ultimate postoperative return to normal activity in comparison to the TP approach. There does appear to be a trend toward a shorter operative time for the RP approach. The RP laparoscopic approach is our method of choice for patients with benign renal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8833728     DOI: 10.1089/end.1996.10.45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

Review 1.  Justification of extraperitoneal laparoscopic access for surgery of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  András Hoznek; Laurent Salomon; Matthew Gettman; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Laparoscopic renal surgery for benign disease.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Alberto Breda; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitri Liapis; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard; Grégoire Robert; Laurence Bastien; Andras Hoznek; Dimitri Vordos; Claude Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Robotic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Mayank Patel; James Porter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction in horseshoe kidney: our initial experience.

Authors:  Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Jhanwar; Vishwajeet Singh; Gaurav Prakash
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-07-08

6.  Laparoscopic complete/partial nephroureterectomy in children in a single institution-nearly a decade of experience: what have we learned?

Authors:  C Holbrook; S Abdel Salam; M Kulkarni; A Mathur
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Paediatric computer-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Anderberg; Christina Clementson Kockum; Einar Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  An initial experience of 100 paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomies with transperitoneal or posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach.

Authors:  Mohan S Gundeti; Yatin Patel; Patrick G Duffy; Peter M Cuckow; Duncan T Wilcox; Imran Mushtaq
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Twenty-year experience with laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in children: considerations and details of technique.

Authors:  Ciro Esposito; Maria Escolino; Francesco Corcione; Isabela Magdalena Draghici; Antonio Savanelli; Marco Castagnetti; Francesco Turrà; Mariapina Cerulo; Alessandra Farina; Alessandro Settimi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for polycystic kidney: comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.

Authors:  Thibaut Benoit; Benoit Peyronnet; Mathieu Roumiguié; Grégory Verhoest; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Arnaud Delreux; Dominique Chauveau; Bernard Malavaud; Andréa Manunta; Michel Soulié; Pascal Rischmann; Karim Bensalah; Xavier Gamé
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.