Literature DB >> 8832662

Conservative management of acoustic neuroma: an outcome study.

H G Deen1, M J Ebersold, S G Harner, C W Beatty, M S Marion, R E Wharen, J D Green, L Quast.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed selection criteria, clinical outcome, and tumor growth rates in patients with acoustic neuromas in whom the initial management strategy was observation.
METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with conservatively managed unilateral acoustic neuromas was conducted. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. Patients with neurofibromatosis Type II were excluded. Differences in tumor growth rates were analyzed by use of the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (31 men and 37 women) with a mean age of 67.1 years were followed for an average of 3.4 years after diagnosis. The reasons for a trial of observation included advanced age (55%), patient preference (21%), minimal symptoms (9%), poor general medical condition (7%), asymptomatic tumor (4%), and tumor in the only hearing ear (4%). Fifty-eight patients (85%) were successfully managed with observation alone. Ten patients (15%) ultimately required treatment (nine received microsurgical treatment and one patient underwent radiosurgical intervention) at a mean time interval of 4.0 years after diagnosis. Forty-eight tumors (71%) showed no growth and 20 (29%) enlarged during the study period. The mean tumor growth rate at the 1-year follow-up was significantly higher in the group requiring treatment (3.0 mm) than in the group not requiring treatment (0.36 mm) (P < 0.0001). Thus, the tumor growth rate at the 1-year follow-up was a strong predictor of the eventual need for treatment.
CONCLUSION: Observation is a reasonable management strategy in carefully selected patients with acoustic neuromas. Diligent follow-up with serial magnetic resonance imaging is recommended, because some tumors will enlarge to the point at which active treatment is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8832662     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199608000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  14 in total

1.  Lipoma of the internal auditory canal: MR findings.

Authors:  J C Méndez; G Saucedo; P Ruiz; A Vega; L Nombela
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-11-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery: comparing different technologies.

Authors:  M Schwartz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-03-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas: safety and effectiveness over 8 years of experience.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Sakanaka; Takashi Mizowaki; Yoshiki Arakawa; Norio Araki; Natsuo Oya; Jun A Takahashi; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Susumu Miyamoto; Nobuo Hashimoto; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Dumbbell schwannomas of the internal auditory canal.

Authors:  K L Salzman; H C Davidson; H R Harnsberger; C M Glastonbury; R H Wiggins; S Ellul; C Shelton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Long-term outcomes of vestibular schwannomas treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Sumit Kapoor; Sachin Batra; Kathryn Carson; John Shuck; Siddharth Kharkar; Rahul Gandhi; Juan Jackson; Jan Wemmer; Stephanie Terezakis; Ori Shokek; Lawrence Kleinberg; Daniele Rigamonti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Management of acoustic neuroma in the only hearing ear.

Authors:  Maged B Naguib; Yasar Cokkeser; Mario Sanna
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Conservative management of acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al Sanosi; Paul A Fagan; Nigel D W Biggs
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2006-05

8.  Tumor-volume changes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: implications for follow-up MR imaging protocol.

Authors:  O W M Meijer; E J Weijmans; D L Knol; B J Slotman; F Barkhof; W P Vandertop; J A Castelijns
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  EAONO position statement on Vestibular Schwannoma: Imaging Assessment Question: How should growth of Vestibular Schwannoma be defined?

Authors:  Romain Kania; Benjamin Vérillaud; Domitille Camous; Charlotte Hautefort; Thomas Somers; Jérôme Waterval; Sébastien Froelich; Philippe Herman
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.017

10.  Management of growing vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Gian Gaetano Ferri; Antonio Pirodda; Alberto Rinaldi Ceroni; Antonio Fioravanti; Fabio Calbucci; Giovanni Carlo Modugno
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.