Literature DB >> 8831788

High-resolution structures of the ligand binding domain of the wild-type bacterial aspartate receptor.

J I Yeh1, H P Biemann, G G Privé, J Pandit, D E Koshland, S H Kim.   

Abstract

The high-resolution structures of the wild-type periplasmic domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor have been determined in the absence and presence of bound aspartate to 1.85 and 2.2 A resolution, respectively. As we reported earlier, in the refined structure of the complexed form of the crosslinked cysteine mutant receptor, the binding of the aspartate at the first site was mediated through four bridging water molecules while the second site showed an occupant electron density that best fit a sulfate group, which was present in the crystallization solution at high concentration. In the wild-type periplasmic domain structure two aspartate residues are bound per dimer, but with different occupancies. There exists a "strong" aspartate-binding site whose binding is again mediated by four water molecules while the second site contains aspartate whose B-factor is about 10% higher, signifying weaker binding. The interaction between the second, "weaker" aspartate with the three ligand-binding arginine side-chains is slightly different from the first site. The major difference is that there are three water molecules mediating the binding of aspartate at the second site, whereas in the first site there are four bridging water molecules. The fact that aspartate-complexed crystals of the wild-type were grown with a large excess aspartate while the cross-linked crystals were grown with equal molar aspartate may explain the difference in the stoichiometry observed. The conservation of the four bridging water molecules in the strong aspartate site of both the cross-linked and wild-type periplasmic domain may reflect an important binding motif. The periplasmic domain in the apo form is a symmetrical dimer, in which each of the subunits is equivalent, and the two aspartate binding sites are identical. Upon the binding of aspartate, the subunits are no longer symmetrical. The main difference between the aspartate-bound and unbound forms is in a small, rigid-body rotation between the subunits within a dimer. The rotation is similar in both direction and magnitude in the crosslinked and wild-type periplasmic domains. The presence of the second aspartate in the wild-type structure does not make any additional rotation compared to the single-site binding. The conservation of the small angular change in vitro suggests that the inter-subunit rotation may have relevance to the understanding of the mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831788     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  56 in total

Review 1.  How signals are heard during bacterial chemotaxis: protein-protein interactions in sensory signal propagation.

Authors:  A Bren; M Eisenbach
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Propagating conformational changes over long (and short) distances in proteins.

Authors:  E W Yu; D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Structure of a conserved receptor domain that regulates kinase activity: the cytoplasmic domain of bacterial taxis receptors.

Authors:  J J Falke; S H Kim
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity.

Authors:  Sung-Hou Kim; Weiru Wang; Kyeong Kyu Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Electron microscopic analysis of membrane assemblies formed by the bacterial chemotaxis receptor Tsr.

Authors:  Robert M Weis; Teruhisa Hirai; Anas Chalah; Martin Kessel; Peter J Peters; Sriram Subramaniam
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  A possible degree of motional freedom in bacterial chemoreceptor cytoplasmic domains and its potential role in signal transduction.

Authors:  Weiguo Hu
Journal:  Int J Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2011-02-25

Review 7.  Identification of ligands for bacterial sensor proteins.

Authors:  Matilde Fernández; Bertrand Morel; Andrés Corral-Lugo; Miriam Rico-Jiménez; David Martín-Mora; Diana López-Farfán; José Antonio Reyes-Darias; Miguel A Matilla; Álvaro Ortega; Tino Krell
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Differentiation between electron transport sensing and proton motive force sensing by the Aer and Tsr receptors for aerotaxis.

Authors:  Jessica C Edwards; Mark S Johnson; Barry L Taylor
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Two-tiered histidine kinase pathway involved in heat shock and salt sensing in the general stress response of Sphingomonas melonis Fr1.

Authors:  Andreas Kaczmarczyk; Ramon Hochstrasser; Julia A Vorholt; Anne Francez-Charlot
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  The structure of a soluble chemoreceptor suggests a mechanism for propagating conformational signals.

Authors:  Abiola M Pollard; Alexandrine M Bilwes; Brian R Crane
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.