Literature DB >> 25666137

Two-tiered histidine kinase pathway involved in heat shock and salt sensing in the general stress response of Sphingomonas melonis Fr1.

Andreas Kaczmarczyk1, Ramon Hochstrasser1, Julia A Vorholt1, Anne Francez-Charlot2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The general stress response (GSR) allows bacteria to monitor and defend against a broad set of unrelated, adverse environmental conditions. In Alphaproteobacteria, the key step in GSR activation is phosphorylation of the response regulator PhyR. In Sphingomonas melonis Fr1, seven PhyR-activating kinases (Paks), PakA to PakG, are thought to directly phosphorylate PhyR under different stress conditions, but the nature of the activating signals remains obscure. PakF, a major sensor of NaCl and heat shock, lacks a putative sensor domain but instead harbors a single receiver (REC) domain (PakFREC) N-terminal to its kinase catalytic core. Such kinases are called "hybrid response regulators" (HRRs). How HRRs are able to perceive signals in the absence of a true sensor domain has remained largely unexplored. In the present work, we show that stresses are actually sensed by another kinase, KipF (kinase of PakF), which phosphorylates PakFREC and thereby activates PakF. KipF is a predicted transmembrane kinase, harboring a periplasmic CHASE3 domain flanked by two transmembrane helices in addition to its cytoplasmic kinase catalytic core. We demonstrate that KipF senses different salts through its CHASE3 domain but is not a sensor of general osmotic stress. While salt sensing depends on the CHASE3 domain, heat shock sensing does not, suggesting that these stresses are perceived by different mechanisms. In summary, our results establish a two-tiered histidine kinase pathway involved in activation of the GSR in S. melonis Fr1 and provide the first experimental evidence for the so far uncharacterized CHASE3 domain as a salt sensor. IMPORTANCE: Hybrid response regulators (HRRs) represent a particular class of histidine kinases harboring an N-terminal receiver (REC) domain instead of a true sensor domain. This suggests that the actual input for HRRs may be phosphorylation of the REC domain. In the present study, we addressed this question by using the HRR PakF. Our results suggest that PakF is activated through phosphorylation of its REC domain and that this is achieved by another kinase, KipF. KipF senses heat shock and salt stress, with the latter requiring the periplasmic CHASE3 domain. This work not only suggests that HRRs work in two-tiered histidine kinase pathways but also provides the first experimental evidence for a role of the so far uncharacterized CHASE3 domain in salt sensing.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25666137      PMCID: PMC4372748          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00019-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  41 in total

1.  Common extracellular sensory domains in transmembrane receptors for diverse signal transduction pathways in bacteria and archaea.

Authors:  Igor B Zhulin; Anastasia N Nikolskaya; Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  The HWE histidine kinases, a new family of bacterial two-component sensor kinases with potentially diverse roles in environmental signaling.

Authors:  Baruch Karniol; Richard D Vierstra
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions.

Authors:  E Krissinel; K Henrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-11-26

Review 4.  Signal transduction and gene regulation through the phosphorylation of two regulatory components: the molecular basis for the osmotic regulation of the porin genes.

Authors:  T Mizuno; S Mizushima
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  High-resolution structures of the ligand binding domain of the wild-type bacterial aspartate receptor.

Authors:  J I Yeh; H P Biemann; G G Privé; J Pandit; D E Koshland; S H Kim
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Environmentally regulated gene expression for membrane proteins in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S Forst; M Inouye
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1988

7.  Aspartate taxis mutants of the Escherichia coli tar chemoreceptor.

Authors:  C Wolff; J S Parkinson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Mutations in the aspartate receptor of Escherichia coli which affect aspartate binding.

Authors:  S L Mowbray; D E Koshland
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Glutamate at the site of phosphorylation of nitrogen-regulatory protein NTRC mimics aspartyl-phosphate and activates the protein.

Authors:  K E Klose; D S Weiss; S Kustu
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Aspartate and maltose-binding protein interact with adjacent sites in the Tar chemotactic signal transducer of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  P Gardina; C Conway; M Kossman; M Manson
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Structure and function of HWE/HisKA2-family sensor histidine kinases.

Authors:  Julien Herrou; Sean Crosson; Aretha Fiebig
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Brucella abortus ΔrpoE1 confers protective immunity against wild type challenge in a mouse model of brucellosis.

Authors:  Jonathan W Willett; Julien Herrou; Daniel M Czyz; Jason X Cheng; Sean Crosson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Allosteric control of a bacterial stress response system by an anti-σ factor.

Authors:  Justin L Luebke; Daniel S Eaton; Joseph R Sachleben; Sean Crosson
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 4.  General Stress Signaling in the Alphaproteobacteria.

Authors:  Aretha Fiebig; Julien Herrou; Jonathan Willett; Sean Crosson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  A Single-Domain Response Regulator Functions as an Integrating Hub To Coordinate General Stress Response and Development in Alphaproteobacteria.

Authors:  A Kaczmarczyk; I de Jong; C Lori; U Jenal
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Inverted signaling by bacterial chemotaxis receptors.

Authors:  Shuangyu Bi; Fan Jin; Victor Sourjik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Complex general stress response regulation in Sphingomonas melonis Fr1 revealed by transcriptional analyses.

Authors:  Lisa Gottschlich; Petra Geiser; Miriam Bortfeld-Miller; Christopher M Field; Julia A Vorholt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Extracytoplasmic Function σ Factors as Tools for Coordinating Stress Responses.

Authors:  Rubén de Dios; Eduardo Santero; Francisca Reyes-Ramírez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Lvr, a Signaling System That Controls Global Gene Regulation and Virulence in Pathogenic Leptospira.

Authors:  Haritha Adhikarla; Elsio A Wunder; Ariel E Mechaly; Sameet Mehta; Zheng Wang; Luciane Santos; Vimla Bisht; Peter Diggle; Gerald Murray; Ben Adler; Francesc Lopez; Jeffrey P Townsend; Eduardo Groisman; Mathieu Picardeau; Alejandro Buschiazzo; Albert I Ko
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Comparative Genome Analyses Reveal the Genomic Traits and Host Plant Adaptations of Flavobacterium akiainvivens IK-1T.

Authors:  Xuehua Wan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.