Literature DB >> 8831544

Interleukin-6 and stress hormone responses after uncomplicated gasless laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy.

R Fukushima1, Y J Kawamura, H Saito, Y Saito, Y Hashiguchi, T Sawada, T Muto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colectomy has increasingly been advocated as an option for treatment of colonic disease. The purpose of this study was to compare effects of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy (LAS) and conventional open colectomy (OPEN) on postoperative cytokine and stress hormone responses.
METHODS: Fourteen patients with sigmoid colon cancer, apparently free of preoperative complications, were analyzed. Patients in both groups underwent sigmoid colectomy with lymphadenectomy. LAS was performed by the gasless abdominal wall-lifting method. A 5 cm incision was placed at the beginning of the operation. Blood samples were taken preoperatively and postoperatively for measurement of interleukin-6, glucagon and C-reactive protein. Urinary catecholamine excretions were also determined postoperatively.
RESULTS: The two groups of patients were similar with respect to age (61 +/- 7 for LAS vs. 64 +/- 9 for OPEN) and sex. Intraoperative blood loss did not differ significantly between groups (112 +/- 97 ml for LAS vs. 366 +/- 380 ml for OPEN). Operative times for LAS tended to be longer than those for OPEN (231 +/- 67 vs. 169 +/- 45 minutes; P = 0.08). Similar time courses of postoperative interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, and stress hormone responses were observed in both groups. No significant differences were observed in the magnitude of changes except that the serum interleukin-6 level on day of surgery (postoperative day 0) was significantly higher in LAS patients than in those receiving OPEN. In addition, interleukin-6 levels showed a significant positive correlation with operative duration (r = 0.582; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that stress responses after sigmoid colectomy, in patients undergoing LAS, are comparable with those of patients receiving OPEN and that the early interleukin-6 response after surgery appears to be associated with operative time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831544     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal malignancies: a systematic review.

Authors:  A E Chapman; M D Levitt; P Hewett; R Woods; H Sheiner; G J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Production of intraperitoneal interleukin-6 following open or laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Youichi Kumagai; Yusuke Tajima; Toru Ishiguro; Norihiro Haga; Hideko Imaizumi; Okihide Suzuki; Koki Kuwabara; Takeaki Matsuzawa; Jun Sobajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Hiroyuki Baba; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

4.  Systemic inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colectomy for cancer: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsamis; George Theodoropoulos; Paraskevas Stamopoulos; Spyridon Siakavellas; Thalassini Delistathi; Nikolaos V Michalopoulos; George C Zografos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Which is more invasive-mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  T Shitama; T Kiyama; M Naito; K Shiramizu; G Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jian-Kun Hu; Zong-Guang Zhou; Zhi-Xin Chen; Lan-Lan Wang; Yong-Yang Yu; Jin Liu; Bo Zhang; Li Li; Ye Shu; Jia-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  R Veldkamp; M Gholghesaei; H J Bonjer; D W Meijer; M Buunen; J Jeekel; B Anderberg; M A Cuesta; A Cuschierl; A Fingerhut; J W Fleshman; P J Guillou; E Haglind; J Himpens; C A Jacobi; J J Jakimowicz; F Koeckerling; A M Lacy; E Lezoche; J R Monson; M Morino; E Neugebauer; S D Wexner; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Inflammatory and tumor stimulating responses after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.

Authors:  Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Hyun Cheol Chung; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopic surgery for abdominal conditions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Aruparayil; W Bolton; A Mishra; L Bains; J Gnanaraj; R King; T Ensor; N King; D Jayne; B Shinkins
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1.

Authors:  Melanie Goldfarb; Steven Brower; S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.