Literature DB >> 8831296

An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.

J Brockner1, B M Wiesenfeld.   

Abstract

The authors suggest that procedural and distributive factors interactively combine to influence individuals' reactions to their encounters with other people, groups, and organizations. Results from 45 independent samples (reviewed herein) show that (a) level of procedural justice is more positively related to individuals' reactions when outcome fairness or valence is relatively low and (b) level of outcome fairness or valence is more positively related to individuals' reactions when procedural justice is relatively low. They present various explanations of the interaction effect. Theoretical progress may be achieved through future efforts to delineate the conditions under which each of the explanations is more versus less likely to account for the interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8831296     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  13 in total

1.  Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring.

Authors:  Barry Bozeman; Jan Youtie
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Organisational injustice and impaired cardiovascular regulation among female employees.

Authors:  M Elovainio; M Kivimäki; S Puttonen; H Lindholm; T Pohjonen; T Sinervo
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Children Consider Procedures, Outcomes, and Emotions When Judging the Fairness of Inequality.

Authors:  Lucy M Stowe; Rebecca Peretz-Lange; Peter R Blake
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

4.  Effects of outcomes and random arbitration on emotions in a competitive gambling task.

Authors:  Benoit Bediou; Christelle Mohri; Jeremy Lack; David Sander
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-04

5.  A qualitative study of the role of workplace and interpersonal trust in shaping service quality and responsiveness in Zambian primary health centres.

Authors:  Stephanie M Topp; Julien M Chipukuma
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  Children's Inequity Aversion in Procedural Justice Context: A Comparison of Advantageous and Disadvantageous Inequity.

Authors:  Xiaoju Qiu; Jing Yu; Tingyu Li; Nanhua Cheng; Liqi Zhu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-18

Review 7.  Association Between Work-Related Stress and Coronary Heart Disease: A Review of Prospective Studies Through the Job Strain, Effort-Reward Balance, and Organizational Justice Models.

Authors:  Jaskanwal D Sara; Megha Prasad; Mackram F Eleid; Ming Zhang; R Jay Widmer; Amir Lerman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  On the Value of Considering Specific Facets of Interactional Justice Perceptions.

Authors:  Evelyne Fouquereau; Alexandre J S Morin; Tiphaine Huyghebaert; Séverine Chevalier; Hélène Coillot; Nicolas Gillet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-15

9.  Religiosity, neutrality, fairness, skepticism, and societal tranquility: A data science analysis of the World Values Survey.

Authors:  Leigh Allison; Chun Wang; Jessica Kaminsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  When and Why Demands Reveal Their Challenging Potential during Change.

Authors:  Charlotte Blum; Thomas Rigotti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.