Literature DB >> 33428664

Religiosity, neutrality, fairness, skepticism, and societal tranquility: A data science analysis of the World Values Survey.

Leigh Allison1, Chun Wang2, Jessica Kaminsky1.   

Abstract

Quantitative models of social differences have not only made major contributions to the fields of cross-cultural anthropology, psychology and sociology, but also have allowed for interdisciplinary studies that bring together engineering, life sciences, and social sciences. In this study, the authors use a data science approach to discover a set of quantitative social dimensions based on the World Values Survey, a nationally representative survey covering 60 countries and 90,000 individuals. Five national social dimensions, representing 198 questions and 56 countries are discovered using multidimensional item response theory (MIRT). They are (1) Religiosity, (2) Neutrality, (3) Fairness, (4) Skepticism, and (5) Societal Tranquility. This approach is unique from previous quantitative models because it groups responses by country and analyzes binary, nominal, and ordinal survey questions. It is possible today due to recent advancements in computing power and programming. Furthermore, this methodology tests the validity of previous quantitative dimensions and finds that some of the existing social and cultural dimensions are not clearly discernable. Therefore, this model provides not only more a rigorous methodology but also new social dimensions which more accurately quantify underlying differences across countries in the World Values Survey. Like other quantitative cross-cultural models, this model is a deeply simplified representation of national social differences. However, it is a useful tool for modeling national differences and can be used to help us understand the impacts of social preferences and values on different political, economic, and development variables.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33428664      PMCID: PMC7799817          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  Computing and evaluating factor scores.

Authors:  J W Grice
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  Values and behavior: strength and structure of relations.

Authors:  Anat Bardi; Shalom H Schwartz
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2003-10

3.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

4.  What is the expectation maximization algorithm?

Authors:  Chuong B Do; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research.

Authors:  Fang Fang Chen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-11

6.  The structure and dynamics of worry: theory, measurement, and cross-national replications.

Authors:  K Boehnke; S Schwartz; C Stromberg; L Sagiv
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1998-10

Review 7.  An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures.

Authors:  J Brockner; B M Wiesenfeld
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Comparative Analyses of MIRT Models and Software (BMIRT and flexMIRT).

Authors:  Guler Yavuz; Ronald K Hambleton
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 2.821

9.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance.

Authors:  Steven P Reise; Keith F Widaman; Robin H Pugh
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Dimensions and Dynamics of National Culture: Synthesizing Hofstede With Inglehart.

Authors:  Sjoerd Beugelsdijk; Chris Welzel
Journal:  J Cross Cult Psychol       Date:  2018-10-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.