Literature DB >> 8829393

Spike dipole analysis using SEP dipole as a marker.

H Yoshinaga1, M Sato, E Oka, S Ohtahara.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In dipole localization analysis many problems remain which affect the accuracy of localization. We performed dipole estimation of spikes and SEP components in identical patients. The subjects are 8 cases of benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BCECS), and two cases of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In 8 of 10 cases, we also investigated dipoles using a 3-layer model in addition to a single layer (homogenous) model.
RESULTS: 1) In 8 cases of BCECS, the spike dipoles were concentrated at the central line near the SEP dipoles, at a slightly fronto-lateral-downward position to the latter. The spike dipoles seemed to be situated at the bottom of the sensory cortex. 2) In two cases of TLE, the spike dipoles were located at the same coronal plane with the SEP dipoles, and more deeply seated mesially. The spike dipoles seemed to be at the bottom of the mesial temporal area. 3) Using 3-layer models, both the spike dipoles and the SEP dipoles located more superficially, while conserving the positional relationship with each other.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to more accurately define spike dipoles by using the SEP dipole as a marker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8829393     DOI: 10.1007/bf01187666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  18 in total

1.  How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head?

Authors:  B J Roth; M Balish; A Gorbach; S Sato
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10

2.  The magnetic and electric fields agree with intracranial localizations of somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  W W Sutherling; P H Crandall; T M Darcey; D P Becker; M F Levesque; D S Barth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Effect of inhomogeneities on surface signals coming from a cerebral current-dipole source.

Authors:  M Schneider
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components.

Authors:  J E Desmedt; G Cheron
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-12

5.  Do optimal dipoles obtained by the dipole tracing method always suggest true source locations?

Authors:  T Musha; S Homma
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Dipole tracing in childhood epilepsy with special reference to rolandic epilepsy.

Authors:  H Yoshinaga; R Amano; E Oka; S Ohtahara
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 7.  Localization of seizure foci: pitfalls and caveats.

Authors:  P Jayakar; M Duchowny; T J Resnick; L A Alvarez
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 8.  Source modelling of the rolandic focus.

Authors:  P K Wong
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain.

Authors:  D Cohen; B N Cuffin; K Yunokuchi; R Maniewski; C Purcell; G R Cosgrove; J Ives; J G Kennedy; D L Schomer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Magnetoencephalographic evaluation of children and adolescents with intractable epilepsy.

Authors:  R Paetau; M Hämäläinen; R Hari; M Kajola; J Karhu; T A Larsen; E Lindahl; O Salonen
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.