Literature DB >> 7691548

How well does a three-sphere model predict positions of dipoles in a realistically shaped head?

B J Roth1, M Balish, A Gorbach, S Sato.   

Abstract

The electrical potential produced by a dipole in the temporal or frontal lobe was calculated for a realistically shaped scalp, skull, and brain. This potential distribution was then used with a 3-sphere model to predict the position, orientation, and strength of the dipole source. The original and predicted dipole positions differed by an average of 1.97 cm, with a difference of more than 4 cm in some cases. Control calculations demonstrated that this difference was not caused by numerical artifacts in the computation, but instead was due to a true difference between the 3-sphere and realistically shaped head models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7691548     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90017-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  22 in total

1.  Brain evoked potential topographic mapping based on the diffuse approximation.

Authors:  D Bouattoura; P Gaillard; P Villon; F Langevin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Dipole location errors in electroencephalogram source analysis due to volume conductor model errors.

Authors:  B Vanrumste; G Van Hoey; R Van de Walle; M D'Havé; I Lemahieu; P Boon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Fast realistic modeling in bioelectromagnetism using lead-field interpolation.

Authors:  B Yvert; A Crouzeix-Cheylus; J Pernier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neuroelectromagnetic forward head modeling toolbox.

Authors:  Zeynep Akalin Acar; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.

Authors:  Olaf Steinsträter; Stephanie Sillekens; Markus Junghoefer; Martin Burger; Carsten H Wolters
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Evaluating the spatial relationship of event-related potential and functional MRI sources in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Kevin Whittingstall; Gerhard Stroink; Matthias Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Equivalent source estimation of scalp potential fields contaminated by heteroscedastic and correlated noise.

Authors:  H M Huizenga; P C Molenaar
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Comparison of realistically shaped boundary-element and spherical head models in source localization of early somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  H Buchner; T D Waberski; M Fuchs; H A Wischmann; M Wagner; R Drenckhahn
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Realistic and spherical head modeling for EEG forward problem solution: a comparative cortex-based analysis.

Authors:  Federica Vatta; Fabio Meneghini; Fabrizio Esposito; Stefano Mininel; Francesco Di Salle
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-14

10.  EEG/MEG source imaging: methods, challenges, and open issues.

Authors:  Katrina Wendel; Outi Väisänen; Jaakko Malmivuo; Nevzat G Gencer; Bart Vanrumste; Piotr Durka; Ratko Magjarević; Selma Supek; Mihail Lucian Pascu; Hugues Fontenelle; Rolando Grave de Peralta Menendez
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.