Literature DB >> 8439113

Efficacy of oral ondansetron in the prevention of emesis in outpatients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. The Ondansetron Study Group.

T M Beck1, A A Ciociola, S E Jones, W H Harvey, N S Tchekmedyian, A Chang, D Galvin, N E Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral ondansetron (Zofran) as an antiemetic in patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.
DESIGN: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, placebo-controlled trial conducted between March 1989 and January 1990.
SETTING: Twenty-seven oncology centers including university hospitals, community cancer centers, and private medical oncology practices. PATIENTS: A total of 349 chemotherapy-naive patients having their first cycle of cyclophosphamide (> or = 450 mg/m2)-based chemotherapy. Patients also received methotrexate (> or = 30 mg/m2) or doxorubicin (> or = 35 mg/m2). All patients were evaluated for safety and 318 (91%) were evaluated for efficacy.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: placebo, 1 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg of ondansetron. Assigned study medication was taken three times per day for 3 consecutive days. MEASUREMENTS: Time and number of emetic episodes as well as degree of nausea were recorded by patients for each of the 3 study days.
RESULTS: Compared with placebo, all three doses of ondansetron were superior (P < 0.001) in preventing vomiting and controlling nausea. A complete response (no emetic episodes) was observed in 19%, 57%, 65%, and 66% of patients in the placebo, 1-mg, 4-mg, and 8-mg ondansetron groups, respectively. For patients who received higher-dose cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, a dose-related trend in antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron was observed. Mild headache and constipation were the most frequently reported adverse events. No extrapyramidal reactions were observed.
CONCLUSION: Oral ondansetron is a safe and effective antiemetic that is more efficacious than placebo for patients receiving cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8439113     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-6-199303150-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  9 in total

Review 1.  Equipoise: asking the right questions for clinical trial design.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Not all placebos are the same: a debate on the ethics of placebo use in clinical trials versus clinical practice.

Authors:  Alex Cahana; Simone Romagnioli
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; E Ballatori; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Ondansetron: costs and resource utilisation in a US teaching hospital setting.

Authors:  N E Johnson; D B Nash; C E Carpenter; C J Sistek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid excretion following combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil plus ondansetron compared to ondansetron alone.

Authors:  A du Bois; W Vach; R Holy; H Kriesinger-Schröder
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Dose-ranging evaluation of the antiemetic efficacy of intravenous dolasetron in patients receiving chemotherapy with doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  P J Hesketh; D R Gandara; A M Hesketh; A Facada; E A Perez; L M Webber; L A Martin; M B Cramer; W F Hahne
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  [Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research].

Authors:  A Du Bois
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-01

8.  Aprepitant as salvage antiemetic therapy in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Paul J Hesketh; Jerry Younger; Pedro Sanz-Altamira; Melissa Hayden; Julie Bushey; Brian Trainor; Michael Krentzin; Peter Nowd; Konstantinos Arnaoutakis; Ann M Hesketh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and cortisol excretion as predictors of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  A du Bois; W Vach; U Wechsel; R Holy; W Schaefer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.