Literature DB >> 8826300

A study of interruption rates for practice nurses and GPs.

F Paxton, D Heaney, J Howie, B A Porter.   

Abstract

This study compares the rate and perceptions of interruptions experienced by practice nurses and GPs. During two recording periods, nurses noted the number of interruptions they experienced before and during their consultations (Paxton et al 1996). The nurses reported 48.5 interruptions per 100 consultations in the first period and 30.2 in the second. Fifty per cent of nurses in the first period and 33 per cent in the second were interrupted during consultation more than ten times per 100 consultations. Nurses reported that interruptions were distracting, affected patient flow and that the confidential nature of some consultations was irrevocably damaged by constant disturbances. It was the perception of the nurses that GPs caused most interruptions. Few patients, however, reported being disturbed as a result of an interruption to the nurse. The rate of interruptions for GPs was much lower and 94 per cent reported being interrupted during fewer than one in 20 consultations, although even then doctors reported interruptions as disruptive. Despite the decrease in interruptions to nurses in the second period of recording, the level remained much higher than that of interruptions to doctors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8826300     DOI: 10.7748/ns.10.43.33.s53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Stand        ISSN: 0029-6570


  10 in total

Review 1.  Problems for clinical judgement: 3. Thinking clearly in an emergency.

Authors:  M J Schull; L E Ferris; J V Tu; J E Hux; D A Redelmeier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Towards a hybrid method to categorize interruptions and activities in healthcare.

Authors:  Juliana J Brixey; David J Robinson; Craig W Johnson; Todd R Johnson; James P Turley; Vimla L Patel; Jiajie Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  Interruptions in workflow for RNs in a Level One Trauma Center.

Authors:  Juliana J Brixey; David J Robinson; Zhihua Tang; Todd R Johnson; Jiajie Zhang; James P Turley
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Impacts of Operational Failures on Primary Care Physicians' Work: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis of the Literature.

Authors:  Carol Sinnott; Alexandros Georgiadis; John Park; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Technology Implementation and Associated Pharmacy Interruptions.

Authors:  Kalyan S Pasupathy; Mayo Clinic; Linsey M Steege; Chris C Cho
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 6.  Interruptions and distractions in healthcare: review and reappraisal.

Authors:  A J Rivera-Rodriguez; B-T Karsh
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-04-08

7.  Information chaos in primary care: implications for physician performance and patient safety.

Authors:  John W Beasley; Tosha B Wetterneck; Jon Temte; Jamie A Lapin; Paul Smith; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ben-Tzion Karsh
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

8.  Testing modes of computerized sepsis alert notification delivery systems.

Authors:  Mikhail A Dziadzko; Andrew M Harrison; Ing C Tiong; Brian W Pickering; Pablo Moreno Franco; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Effect of a printed reminder in the waiting room to turn off mobile phones during consultation: a before and after study.

Authors:  Ludovic Reveiz; Sylvia de Aguiar
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Investigating the impact of extraneous distractions on consultations in general practice: lessons learned.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Robert McKinley; Carolyn O'Shea; Hayley Arnet; Katrina Spilsbury; Marthe Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.