Literature DB >> 8826069

Action research--a strategy for evaluation of medical interventions.

K Malterud1.   

Abstract

Medical intervention commonly addresses issues which can rarely be controlled and measured experimentally. The zeal for standardization of the intervention may lead to premature closure of a development process, in which the intervention method and its implementation are omitted from systematic evaluation. However, evaluation strategies other than the experimental ones do exist and can overcome these limitations. Action research is presented as an alternative approach for evaluation of medical interventions. This strategy denotes the study of a social situation, intended to improve the quality of action. The two central concerns--improvements in practice and increased knowledge and understanding--are linked together in an integrated and dynamic cycle of activities, in which each phase learns from the previous one and in turn shapes the next. The stages of research involve problem identification, planning, action and evaluation. A model for medical action research, intended to facilitate evaluation of every step, is presented and discussed, illustrated by an example from primary health care research. Evaluation must account for the following elements of the process: problem identification, summarizing previous experience, determining the aims of intervention, planning and development of the intervention method, design and articulation of the intervention strategy, implementation of action, and redefining the problem. Potentials and limitations of the action research strategy are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8826069     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.4.476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  9 in total

1.  Introducing the theme in a qualitative interview using a visual starter.

Authors:  B Lorentzson; E Trell
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Heather Angier; Aleksandra Sumic; Rose L Harding; Erika K Cottrell; Deborah J Cohen; Christine A Nelson; Timothy E Burdick; Lorraine S Wallace; Charles Gallia; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.744

3.  The assessment and management of diabetes related lower limb problems in India-an action research approach to integrating best practice.

Authors:  Michael Harrison-Blount; Michelle Cullen; Christopher J Nester; Anita E Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: an action research study evaluating barriers and promotors.

Authors:  Henriette Bruun; Reidar Pedersen; Elsebeth Stenager; Christian Backer Mogensen; Lotte Huniche
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Ethical challenges experienced by prehospital emergency personnel: a practice-based model of analysis.

Authors:  Henriette Bruun; Louise Milling; Søren Mikkelsen; Lotte Huniche
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.834

6.  African primary care research: participatory action research.

Authors:  Bob Mash
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2014-03-05

7.  Supervision of professionals: Interdependency between embodied experiences and professional knowledge.

Authors:  Aud Marie Øien; Inger Johanne Solheim
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2015-11-17

8.  How to create more supportive supervision for primary healthcare: lessons from Ngamiland district of Botswana: co-operative inquiry group.

Authors:  Oathokwa Nkomazana; Robert Mash; Silvia Wojczewski; Ruth Kutalek; Nthabiseng Phaladze
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Hospital ethics reflection groups: a learning and development resource for clinical practice.

Authors:  H Bruun; L Huniche; E Stenager; C B Mogensen; R Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.