Literature DB >> 8825132

Value of CA 15.3 in breast cancer and comparison with CEA and TPA: a study of specificity in disease-free follow-up patients and sensitivity in patients at diagnosis of the first metastasis.

E Vizcarra1, A Lluch, R Cibrián, F Jarque, V Alberola, V Belloch, J García-Conde.   

Abstract

The specificity and sensitivity of a tumor marker (TM) are important in establishing its potential clinical utility for a specific type of neoplasm. CA 15.3 is a TM specific for breast cancer; it is defined by two monoclonal antibodies (DF3 and 115D8), whose specificity, in disease-free follow-up patients, and sensitivity, in patients at diagnosis of first metastasis, have been evaluated in the present study and compared with those of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA). Serum concentrations of all three TMs were quantified in 618 individuals: 80 healthy controls, 421 patients with local breast cancer who became free of disease following locoregional treatment, and 117 patients with disseminated disease at diagnosis of metastasis. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was the method employed, and the cut-off values obtained were 30 U/ml for CA 15.3, 5 ng/ml for CEA, and 120 U/I for TPA. The results showed CA 15.3 and CEA specificities to be analogous (95.7 and 95.5%, respectively). TPA specificity (81.9%) was lower (p < 0.001). During adjuvant therapy, CA 15.3 serum levels were seen to increase, followed by a normalization of concentration after terminating therapy. On the other hand, CA 15.3 and TPA sensitivities (64.1 and 67.5%, respectively) were greater than for CEA (44.4%, p < 0.01). It is concluded that CA 15.3 is a useful TM for breast cancer, as it offers a greater sensitivity than CEA and a higher specificity than TPA. Combining CA 15.3 and CEA fails to increase CA 15.3 sensitivity, while combining CA 15.3 with TPA increases false-positives and so likewise offers no additional benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8825132     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  20 in total

1.  Clinical value of a mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen in monitoring breast cancer patients in comparison with CA 15-3.

Authors:  A R Miserez; I Günes; J Müller-Brand; E Walther; R Fridrich; H Mäcke
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Comparison of circulating CA15-3 and carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  D F Hayes; V R Zurawski; D W Kufe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Increased carcinoembryonic antigen in heavy cigarette smokers.

Authors:  D P Stevens; I R Mackay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-12-01       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Circulating CA 15-3 levels in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients and in non-malignant diseases.

Authors:  R Colomer; A Ruibal; J Genollá; D Rubio; J M Del Campo; R Bodi; L Salvador
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  CA-15.3, TPA and MCA as markers for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Barak; M Steiner; B Finkel; J Abrahamson; S Antal; N Gruener
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  A rational postoperative follow-up with carcinoembryonic antigen, tissue polypeptide antigen, and urinary hydroxyproline in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  A Nicolini; A Carpi; G Di Marco; L Giuliani; R Giordani; S Palla
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Carcinoembryonic antigen.

Authors:  R H Fletcher
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  The prognostic significance of carcinoembryonic antigen determinations in patients with adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  K E Kjorstad; H Orjasaeter
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Comparative values of several tumour markers: example of untreated breast carcinoma.

Authors:  J L Cazin; P Gosselin; B Boniface; M C Demaille; M Boniface; A Demaille
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Value of CA 15:3 in the follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  D M Pons-Anicet; B P Krebs; R Mira; M Namer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multiplexed SOI BioFETs.

Authors:  Aleksandar Vacic; Jason M Criscione; Eric Stern; Nitin K Rajan; Tarek Fahmy; Mark A Reed
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  Kinetics of CEA and CA15-3 correlate with treatment response in patients undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  Dorit Di Gioia; Volker Heinemann; Dorothea Nagel; Michael Untch; Steffen Kahlert; Ingo Bauerfeind; Thomas Koehnke; Petra Stieber
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-05-08

Review 3.  Recent advances on applications of immunosensing systems based on nanomaterials for CA15-3 breast cancer biomarker detection.

Authors:  Ika Kustiyah Oktaviyanti; Diyar Salahuddin Ali; Sura A Awadh; Maria Jade Catalan Opulencia; Shukhrat Yusupov; Rui Dias; Fahad Alsaikhan; Mais Mahmood Mohammed; Himanshu Sharma; Yasser Fakri Mustafa; Marwan Mahmood Saleh
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Symptomatic metastasis prediction with serial measurements of CA 15.3 in primary breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Amir Bahrami-Ahmadi; Fariborz Makarian; Mohammad R Mortazavizadeh; Mohammad F Yazdi; Mehdi Chamani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Assessment of circulating tumor cells and serum markers for progression-free survival prediction in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  François-Clément Bidard; David Hajage; Thomas Bachelot; Suzette Delaloge; Etienne Brain; Mario Campone; Paul Cottu; Philippe Beuzeboc; Emilie Rolland; Claire Mathiot; Jean-Yves Pierga
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 6.  Molecular markers for breast cancer: prediction on tumor behavior.

Authors:  Bruna Karina Banin Hirata; Julie Massayo Maeda Oda; Roberta Losi Guembarovski; Carolina Batista Ariza; Carlos Eduardo Coral de Oliveira; Maria Angelica Ehara Watanabe
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  A dried blood spot mass spectrometry metabolomic approach for rapid breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Qingjun Wang; Tao Sun; Yunfeng Cao; Peng Gao; Jun Dong; Yanhua Fang; Zhongze Fang; Xiaoyu Sun; Zhitu Zhu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  High Expression of Three-Gene Signature Improves Prediction of Relapse-Free Survival in Estrogen Receptor-Positive and Node-Positive Breast Tumors.

Authors:  Arvind Thakkar; Hemanth Raj; Bhaskaran Muthuvelan; Arun Balakrishnan; Muralidhara Padigaru
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2015-11-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.