Literature DB >> 8823341

Status of the medical oncology workforce. The American Society of Clinical Oncology.

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A survey was designed to determine accurately the number of full-time equivalent medical oncologists in the United States, to determine how medical oncologists in different work settings divide their professional activities, and to determine whether medical oncology represents a primary care specialty in the minds of practicing oncologists.
METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to the 4,239 members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) who identified themselves as medical oncologists or hematologists/oncologists and were current residents of the United States. Follow-up letters, which included a second copy of the questionnaire, were sent to nonresponders. A third mailing, followed by a telephone reminder, was sent to a randomly selected subset of 300 nonresponders to be certain that the initial responders were similar in practice patterns and attitudes to those individuals who had not initially completed the survey.
RESULTS: A total of 2,540 physicians responded to the first mailing and an additional 187 to the second (64% response rate); a further 196 individuals who were directly contacted completed the survey document. Practitioners appear to see 160 to 200 different patients per month and to devote approximately 72% of their time to patient care activities. Research and teaching comprised only 3% to 4% of professional time for physicians in private practice or Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) settings, in contrast to 16% for those who worked in community hospitals. Medical oncologists frequently serve the role of principal care giver while patients are undergoing cancer treatment. However, medical oncologists devote minimal time providing primary care services to patients and, if required to increase their clinical volume, would prefer to care for more cancer patients than enhance their primary care activities. It is estimated that the present full-time equivalent number (ie, the conglomorate number of oncologists based on 100% professional effort devoted to clinical care) of medical oncologists is approximately 3,600 individuals. This translates into 1.8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans.
CONCLUSION: The medical oncology community devotes the majority of its time to providing oncologic patient care and does not provide or appear to wish to provide what the public defines as primary care. The survey estimate of 1.8 medical oncologists per 100,000 adult Americans is in close accord with HMO estimates of the number of desired oncologists. Consequently, the supply appears consistent with the anticipated demand. There does not appear to be an oversupply of medical oncologists in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8823341     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.9.2612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  15 in total

1.  Breast cancer survivors' perceptions of survivorship care options.

Authors:  Erica L Mayer; Adrienne B Gropper; Bridget A Neville; Ann H Partridge; Danielle B Cameron; Eric P Winer; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Who will do the work? What work will they do?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship.

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Trends in follow-up and preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Craig C Earle; Robert J Herbert; Bridget A Neville; Amanda L Blackford; Kevin D Frick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The impact of primary care physicians on follow-up care of underserved breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  A population-based assessment of specialty physician involvement in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Nancy L Keating; Arnold L Potosky; Anita Ambs; Yulei He; Mark C Hornbrook; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Young adult cancer survivors' follow-up care expectations of oncologists and primary care physicians.

Authors:  Kiara Hugh-Yeun; Divjot Kumar; Ali Moghaddamjou; Jenny Y Ruan; Winson Y Cheung
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Future supply and demand for oncologists : challenges to assuring access to oncology services.

Authors:  Clese Erikson; Edward Salsberg; Gaetano Forte; Suanna Bruinooge; Michael Goldstein
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Antihypertensive medication adherence in cancer survivors and its affecting factors: results of a Korean population-based study.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jong Hyock Park; Jae Hyun Park; Eun Cheol Park; So Young Kim; Sung Gyeong Kim; Jin Young Choi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Retrospective chart review of severe infusion reactions with rituximab, cetuximab, and bevacizumab in community oncology practices: assessment of clinical consequences.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Edward J Stepanski; Barry V Fortner; Arthur C Houts
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.