Rose C Maly1, Yihang Liu, Allison L Diamant, Amardeep Thind. 1. the Department of Family Medicine, the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles; and the Departments of Family Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) on the receipt of preventive follow-up care after a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis among a low-income population. METHODS: Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential factors associated with receipt of preventive care among 579 low-income women with BC. The main outcome variables at 36 months after BC diagnosis were receipt of annual mammography, Papanicolaou smear in the past 2 years, and ever had colonoscopy for those who were at least 50 years old. The main independent variable was type of provider visit in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Women with a PCP visit only or both PCP and surgeon/cancer specialist visits in the past 12 months were more likely to have had annual mammography (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.67; P = .109 and AOR, 2.20, P = .0008, respectively), a Papanicolaou smear in the past 2 years (AOR, 2.90; P = .04 and AOR, 2.24, P = .009, respectively), and colonoscopy (AOR, 2.99; P = .041 and AOR, 2.17; P = .026, respectively) than those who only visited surgeons/cancer specialists. Indeed, women who saw only a PCP for their follow-up care had the highest odds ratio of receiving each clinical care service. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of PCPs in the medical care of low-income BC survivors results in better preventive follow-up care. Getting PCPs involved in the care of cancer survivors might be particularly pertinent for low-income populations because of lower costs and ease of access compared with cancer specialist-provided care.
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of the involvement of primary care physicians (PCPs) on the receipt of preventive follow-up care after a breast cancer (BC) diagnosis among a low-income population. METHODS: Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify potential factors associated with receipt of preventive care among 579 low-income women with BC. The main outcome variables at 36 months after BC diagnosis were receipt of annual mammography, Papanicolaou smear in the past 2 years, and ever had colonoscopy for those who were at least 50 years old. The main independent variable was type of provider visit in the past 12 months. RESULTS:Women with a PCP visit only or both PCP and surgeon/cancer specialist visits in the past 12 months were more likely to have had annual mammography (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.67; P = .109 and AOR, 2.20, P = .0008, respectively), a Papanicolaou smear in the past 2 years (AOR, 2.90; P = .04 and AOR, 2.24, P = .009, respectively), and colonoscopy (AOR, 2.99; P = .041 and AOR, 2.17; P = .026, respectively) than those who only visited surgeons/cancer specialists. Indeed, women who saw only a PCP for their follow-up care had the highest odds ratio of receiving each clinical care service. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of PCPs in the medical care of low-income BC survivors results in better preventive follow-up care. Getting PCPs involved in the care of cancer survivors might be particularly pertinent for low-income populations because of lower costs and ease of access compared with cancer specialist-provided care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast Cancer; Low Income Population; Primary Care Physicians; Quality of Health Care; Women's Health
Authors: Gertrude A Owusu; Susan Brown Eve; Cynthia M Cready; Kenneth Koelln; Fernando Trevino; Ximena Urrutia-Rojas; Joanne Baumer Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2005-09
Authors: Jaclyn L F Bosco; Timothy L Lash; Marianne N Prout; Diana S M Buist; Ann M Geiger; Reina Haque; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Ankush Chandra; Jonathan W Rick; Cecilia Dalle Ore; Darryl Lau; Alan T Nguyen; Diego Carrera; Alexander Bonte; Annette M Molinaro; Philip V Theodosopoulos; Michael W McDermott; Mitchel S Berger; Manish K Aghi Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.047
Authors: Marium Husain; Timiya S Nolan; Kevin Foy; Raquel Reinbolt; Cassandra Grenade; Maryam Lustberg Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Pragati Advani; Shailesh Advani; Pratibha Nayak; Helena M VonVille; Pamela Diamond; Jason Burnett; Abenaa M Brewster; Sally W Vernon Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Raymond J Chan; Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule; Patsy M Yates; Jon Emery; Michael Jefford; Bogda Koczwara; Nicolas H Hart; Megan Crichton; Larissa Nekhlyudov Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Guangyong Zou; Eric J Holowaty; Nancy L Richter Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2015-10-29