Literature DB >> 8821417

Infarct Size Limitation: acute N-acetylcysteine defense (ISLAND trial): preliminary analysis and report after the first 30 patients.

J Sochman1, J Vrbská, B Musilová, M Rocek.   

Abstract

Our previous experimental research and initial clinical observations regarding the use of N-acetylcysteine in the treatment of ischemic and reperfusion injury in acute myocardial infarction gave rise to a study entitled the Infarct Size Limitation: Acute N-acetylcysteine Defense (ISLAND) trial. Today, this randomized, echocardiographically and angiographically controlled study includes the first 30 patients with a first anterior wall myocardial infarction: Group A (n = 10) consisting of patients with successful recanalization of the infarct-related left anterior descending artery by streptokinase without any further treatment, Group B (n = 10) consisting of patients with failed infarct-related artery recanalization, and Group C (n = 10) comprising patients who had successful streptokinase-induced recanalization of the left anterior descending artery plus N-acetylcysteine administration at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight. The parameters monitored in our study include changes in global and regional left ventricular ejection fraction of the infarct-related segment using echocardiography and, using electrocardiograms and the Wagner QRS scoring system, the amounts of acutely jeopardized and finally infarcted myocardium. In Group A, global left ventricular ejection fraction rose nonsignificantly within 2 weeks from 37.5 +/- 9.6% to 38.5 +/- 13.8%; it declined significantly in Group B from 36.2 +/- 6.1% to 30.1 +/- 6.7% (p < 0.05), while it considerably improved in Group C from 41.7 +/- 4.1% to 59.6 +/- 8.1% (p < 0.001). Regional left ventricular ejection fraction changed significantly only in Group C: from -4.5 +/- 27.3 to 45.6 +/- 16.3 (p < 0.001). In Group A, in which the amount of acutely jeopardized myocardium was 21.7 +/- 7.2, infarction actually occurred in 20.4 +/- 9.7% (practically no myocardial salvage). In Group B, risk area was 18.1 +/- 4.3%, but infarct size rose to a resulting 29.1 +/- 6.0%. Significant myocardial salvage was accomplished only in Group C: of 26.2 +/- 8.1% of jeopardized myocardium, infarct size was reduced to 10.8 +/- 7.1% (salvage by 58.8%). Also, basic division of patients by therapy showed that, although those with nonidentical findings on their coronary arteries were included into the same groups, patients treated with streptokinase plus N-acetylcysteine had significantly more favorable values of the monitored parameters than those treated with streptokinase alone. We conclude our interim analysis suggests that N-acetylcysteine has a beneficial effect, reducing the functional and structural impacts of myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8821417     DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960190205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  12 in total

1.  N-acetylcysteine improves microcirculatory flow during smoking: new effects of an old drug with possible benefits for smokers.

Authors:  Q Lu; I Björkhem; R J Xiu; P Henriksson; A Freyschuss
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Human Tissue-Engineered Model of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury.

Authors:  Timothy Chen; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Oral N-acetylcysteine as an adjunct to standard medical therapy improved heart function in cases with stable class II and III systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Amirhossein Yazdi; Nakisa Khansari; Maryam Mehrpooya; Younes Mohammadi; Shiva Zareie
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  High dose intracoronary N-acetylcysteine in a porcine model of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Markus Meyer; Stephen P Bell; Zengyi Chen; Iwan Nyotowidjojo; Richard R Lachapelle; Timothy F Christian; Pamela C Gibson; Friederike F Keating; Harold L Dauerman; Martin M LeWinter
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  N-acetylcysteine-enhanced contrast provides cardiorenal protection.

Authors:  Markus Meyer; Martin M LeWinter; Stephen P Bell; Zengyi Chen; Donald E Selby; Dinender K Singla; Harold L Dauerman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 6.  Role of Oxidative Stress in Reperfusion following Myocardial Ischemia and Its Treatments.

Authors:  Mi Xiang; Yingdong Lu; Laiyun Xin; Jialiang Gao; Chang Shang; Zhilin Jiang; Hongchen Lin; Xuqin Fang; Yi Qu; Yuling Wang; Zihuan Shen; Mingjing Zhao; Xiangning Cui
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Effect of N-acetylcysteine on oxidative stress and ventricular function in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Dilek Yesilbursa; Akin Serdar; Tunay Senturk; Zehra Serdar; Saim Sağ; Jale Cordan
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 8.  Nanomedicine in the ROS-mediated pathophysiology: Applications and clinical advances.

Authors:  Kevin M Nash; Salahuddin Ahmed
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.307

9.  Immunomodulatory interventions in myocardial infarction and heart failure: a systematic review of clinical trials and meta-analysis of IL-1 inhibition.

Authors:  Mona Panahi; Angelos Papanikolaou; Azam Torabi; Ji-Gang Zhang; Habib Khan; Ali Vazir; Muneer G Hasham; John G F Cleland; Nadia A Rosenthal; Sian E Harding; Susanne Sattler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 10.  Treating oxidative stress in heart failure: past, present and future.

Authors:  Atze van der Pol; Wiek H van Gilst; Adriaan A Voors; Peter van der Meer
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 15.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.