Literature DB >> 8817778

How common is low back pain in the Nordic population? Data from a recent study on a middle-aged general Danish population and four surveys previously conducted in the Nordic countries.

C Leboeuf-Yde1, N Klougart, T Lauritzen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Data were obtained in a Danish cross-sectional postal survey and compared with information from four methodologically similar studies conducted in some of the Nordic countries between 1977-1985.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to estimate the lifetime cumulative incidence and the 1-year period prevalence of low back pain in the general population, to study whether there are any differences in the occurrence of low back pain according to age and sex, and to investigate whether low back pain is on the increase. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence of low back pain commonly is thought to be high, but estimates differ considerably between studies. It is also not known whether low back pain is more common in men or women or in certain age groups, and it is unclear whether the prevalence of low back pain has increased in the past years.
METHODS: Prevalence estimates were established in a current study, and results then were adjusted to suit the age and sex criteria of four previous studies.
RESULTS: Between 60-65% of 30- to 50-year-old men and women living in the Nordic countries reported at least one incident of low back pain during their lifetime, based on the information from four studies with a total sample size of 3513. The most likely 1-year period prevalence estimate is between 44-54%, based on two studies and a total sample of 2035 individuals. There was no consistent evidence favoring higher figures with increasing age or relating to any of the genders. No clearly observed time-related trend was noted.
CONCLUSIONS: When data were examined from five methodologically similar studies on the 30- to 50-year-old Nordic population, there was reasonable consistency of prevalence figures. Thus, approximately 66% report having had low back pain at least sometime during their lifetime and approximately 50% sometime during the preceding year, with no significant differences relating to age or sex. The best method to investigate whether low back pain is on the increase might be through replicate studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817778     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199607010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Cohort study of occupational risk factors of low back pain in construction workers.

Authors:  U Latza; W Karmaus; T Stürmer; M Steiner; A Neth; U Rehder
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Ambiguous relation between physical workload and low back pain: a twin control study.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; K O Kyvik; C Leboeuf-Yde; S Lings; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Intensive education combined with low tech ergonomic intervention does not prevent low back pain in nurses.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lauritzen; S Lings; T Lauritzen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Centralization in patients with sciatica: are pain responses to repeated movement and positioning associated with outcome or types of disc lesions?

Authors:  Hanne B Albert; Eva Hauge; Claus Manniche
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A prospective cohort study on musculoskeletal risk factors for long-term sickness absence among healthcare workers in eldercare.

Authors:  Lars L Andersen; Thomas Clausen; Ole S Mortensen; Hermann Burr; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Prevalence of low back pain and lumbar spine degenerative disorders. Questionnaire survey and clinical-radiological analysis of a representative Hungarian population.

Authors:  Gábor Horváth; Gabriella Koroknai; Barnabás Acs; Péter Than; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Patient education in physiotherapy of low back pain: acute outcomes of group instruction.

Authors:  S D Alston; T J O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

9.  Prevalence of somatoform pain complaints in the German population.

Authors:  Aike Hessel; Manfred Beutel; Michael Geyer; Jörg Schumacher; Elmar Brähler
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2005-03-21

10.  The predictive effect of fear-avoidance beliefs on low back pain among newly qualified health care workers with and without previous low back pain: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jette Nygaard Jensen; Karen Albertsen; Vilhelm Borg; Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.