Literature DB >> 8817619

Parts of visual form: psychophysical aspects.

K Siddiqi1, K J Tresness, B B Kimia.   

Abstract

Part-based representations allow for recognition that is robust in the presence of occlusion, movement, growth, and deletion of portions of an object, and play an important role in theories of object categorization and classification. A partitioning theory for visual form is proposed that is based on two types of parts: limb-based parts arise from a pair of negative curvature minima with evidence for "good continuation' of boundaries on one side; neck-based parts arise from narrowings in shape. The motivation for this model is computational requirements for recognition. The psychophysical relevance of this model is addressed by measuring intrasubject and intersubject consistency in partitioning tasks and comparing perceived and computed parts. A series of experiments were performed in which subjects were required to partition a variety of biological and nonsense two-dimensional shapes into perceived components. Specifically, it was examined (1) whether a subject determines components consistently across different trials of the same partitioning task, (2) whether there is evidence for consistency between subjects for the same partitioning task, and (3) how the perceived parts compare with limbs and necks resulting from the computational model. The results are interpreted as suggesting that there are high levels of both intrasubject and intersubject consistency and that a large majority of the perceived parts do in fact correspond to the parts computed on the basis of our model. The implications of our model are discussed in relation to previous experimental results. Intuitive observations concerning the relationship between parts of visual form and their function are then presented. Finally, a role is envisioned for parts in figure/ground segregation; the notion of a "parts receptive field' through which parts can serve as an intermediate representation between local image features, eg edges, and global object models, is suggested.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817619     DOI: 10.1068/p250399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  Principles of contour information: Reply to Lim and Leek (2012).

Authors:  Manish Singh; Jacob Feldman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Medial axis shape coding in macaque inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Hung; Eric T Carlson; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Bayesian estimation of the shape skeleton.

Authors:  Jacob Feldman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  From interpretation to segmentation.

Authors:  Arno Koning; Rob van Lier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-10

Review 5.  Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

6.  Superordinate shape classification using natural shape statistics.

Authors:  John Wilder; Jacob Feldman; Manish Singh
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-06

7.  Investigating shape representation using sensitivity to part- and axis-based transformations.

Authors:  Kristina Denisova; Jacob Feldman; Xiaotao Su; Manish Singh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Perceiving parts and shapes from concave surfaces.

Authors:  Anthony D Cate; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Constant curvature segments as building blocks of 2D shape representation.

Authors:  Nicholas Baker; Patrick Garrigan; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-12-17

10.  The role of semantics in the perceptual organization of shape.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Jasmin Kleis; Yaniv Morgenstern; Roland W Fleming
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.