Literature DB >> 8817310

Suppression in auditory-nerve fibers of cats using low-side suppressors. I. Temporal aspects.

Y Cai1, C D Geisler.   

Abstract

Two-tone suppression was studied in the auditory nerve fibers of anesthetized cats, using low-frequency suppressors (50-2000 Hz). The response to the characteristic-frequency (CF) tone was suppressed in a phase-specific manner, attaining one or two minimums in 1 cycle of the suppressor (SUP) tone. The suppression phase-lead (i.e., the phase of maximum suppression leading the phase of response to the SUP tone) was about 1/4 cycle for lower-frequency suppressors (50, 100 and 200 Hz), and was close to 1/2 cycle for higher-frequency suppressors (500, 1000 and 2000 Hz). Both the phase of suppression and the suppression phase-lead are independent of fiber spontaneous rate (SR). Some fibers also show a secondary (minor) suppression at higher SUP intensities, which is always about 1/2 cycle away from the first (major) one. Fibers with higher CFs (> 2 kHz) are more likely to show a secondary suppression than those with lower CFs. The threshold difference between the major and minor suppressions is CF-dependent: lower CF fibers usually show differences of 10 dB or greater, while higher CF fibers show smaller differences. The secondary suppression is suppressor-frequency-dependent, usually restricted to lower-frequency suppressors (< or = 200 Hz). No fibers showed a secondary suppression with a SUP frequency 1000 Hz or greater. The phases of suppressions (both the major and minor suppressions) are not affected by the intensity of the CF tone. Non-excitatory, low-frequency suppressors can also give rise to significant suppression. The threshold of synchronization to the SUP tone in the two-tone part was usually the lowest, while the SUP-alone rate threshold was highest. The threshold of synchronization in the SUP-alone segment and threshold of suppression were in between. In some low-SR fibers, complete suppression can be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817310     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00034-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  3 in total

Review 1.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Low-frequency suppression of auditory nerve responses to characteristic frequency tones.

Authors:  A N Temchin; N C Rich; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Low-frequency bias tone suppression of auditory-nerve responses to low-level clicks and tones.

Authors:  Hui Nam; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 3.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.