Literature DB >> 8817282

Effects of procues on error rate and reaction times of antisaccades in human subjects.

B Fischer1, H Weber.   

Abstract

In a gap paradigm, where the saccadic reaction times are usually short, the number of express saccades can be further increased and their latency decreased when a valid transient peripheral cue is given 100 ms before target occurrence. In the present study we measured the saccadic reaction times of seven human subjects who had been instructed to make antisaccades (saccades to the side opposite to stimulus presentation) in the gap paradigm. In the first experiment, we presented a 100% valid cue with 100 ms cue lead time. To explore whether the cue reduced the reaction times of the antisaccades, the cue was always presented on the opposite side to where the stimulus occurred (stimulus direction was randomized between 4 degrees to the left and right), and it was thus indicated in each trial to which side the antisaccade was required (procue). In the second set of experiments the cue was consistently presented on either the left or the right side in two different blocks; it was thus noninformative with respect to the direction of the antisaccade. In the first experiment, a significant increase in mean reaction times of correct antisaccades and a considerable increase in erratic prosaccades to the stimulus were obtained compared with a control session with no cue. In the two experimental blocks with noninformative cues, the reaction times of correct antisaccades were decreased when cue and stimulus were on at the same side, while large numbers of erratic prosaccades were again obtained when cue and stimulus were presented on opposite sides. These results suggest that the orienting mechanism elicited by a transient peripheral cue relates to the command and to the decision to make a pro- versus an antisaccade. Since the subjects reported that they could not prevent, or, moreover, in some cases did not even realize that they were making erratic prosaccades, we conclude that this orienting mechanism occurs automatically, being largely beyond voluntary control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8817282     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  15 in total

1.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Characteristics of "anti" saccades in man.

Authors:  B Fischer; H Weber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans?

Authors:  M G Wenban-Smith; J M Findlay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Presaccadic processes in the generation of pro and anti saccades in human subjects--a reaction-time study.

Authors:  H Weber
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The role of fixation and visual attention in the occurrence of express saccades in man.

Authors:  L Mayfrank; M Mobashery; H Kimmig; B Fischer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci       Date:  1986

6.  Gap duration and location of attention focus modulate the occurrence of left/right asymmetries in the saccadic reaction times of human subjects.

Authors:  H Weber; B Fischer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

8.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades.

Authors:  E Kowler; E Anderson; B Dosher; E Blaser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Attention and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  R W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions.

Authors:  P E Hallett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?

Authors:  Trevor J Crawford; Elisabeth Parker; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jenny Mayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The automatic extraction and use of information from cues and go signals in an anti-saccade task.

Authors:  Clare L Blaukopf; Gregory J DiGirolamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential effects of reward and punishment on conscious and unconscious eye movements.

Authors:  Clare L Blaukopf; Gregory J DiGirolamo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Arousal facilitates involuntary eye movements.

Authors:  Gregory J DiGirolamo; Neha Patel; Clare L Blaukopf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Developmental changes in brain function underlying the influence of reward processing on inhibitory control.

Authors:  Aarthi Padmanabhan; Charles F Geier; Sarah J Ordaz; Theresa Teslovich; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  Prosaccades and antisaccades to onsets and color singletons: evidence that erroneous prosaccades are not reflexive.

Authors:  Richard Godijn; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The anti-orienting phenomenon revisited: effects of gaze cues on antisaccade performance.

Authors:  Felicity D A Wolohan; Trevor J Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Altered error processing following vascular thalamic damage: evidence from an antisaccade task.

Authors:  Jutta Peterburs; Giulio Pergola; Benno Koch; Michael Schwarz; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Irene Daum; Christian Bellebaum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Error awareness and salience processing in the oddball task: shared neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Helga A Harsay; Marcus Spaan; Jasper G Wijnen; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Error correcting mechanisms during antisaccades: contribution of online control during primary saccades and offline control via secondary saccades.

Authors:  Harleen Bedi; Herbert C Goltz; Agnes M F Wong; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.