Literature DB >> 8813313

A prospective study to evaluate oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.

A Davies1, H O'Connor, A L Magos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of vaginal removal of ovaries at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: London teaching hospital. POPULATION: Between March 1993 and March 1995, 40 women were admitted under the care of one consultant for vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy.
METHODS: The success rate of removing the ovaries vaginally was calculated and the operative time, blood loss, intra- and post-operative complications and patient recovery were analysed and compared with 48 patients who had a vaginal hysterectomy but retained their ovaries during the same time period.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine (97.5%) of the 40 women due to undergo removal of the ovaries were managed successfully via the vaginal route; one woman required laparoscopic removal of one of her ovaries containing an ovarian cyst which was not diagnosed pre-operatively. A variety of techniques were used for vaginal oophorectomy which included salpingo-oophorectomy, oophorectomy without salpingectomy, and transvaginal endoscopic oophorectomy utilising endoloop sutures or bipolar electrosurgery. Oophorectomy added a mean of 23.4 min (88.3 vs 64.9 min, 95% CI 10.2-36.7, P < 0.001) to the total operating time compared with vaginal hysterectomy alone. No laparotomies were required, and both the complication rate and post-operative inpatient stay were similar for the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The need to perform oophorectomy should not be considered a contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8813313     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  4 in total

Review 1.  Hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Eva van der Meij; Mark Hans Emanuel
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Opportunistic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for a benign pathological condition.

Authors:  Gery Lamblin; Capucine Meysonnier; Stéphanie Moret; Béatrice Nadaud; Georges Mellier; Gautier Chene
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Adnexal surgery at the time of hysterectomy in women 65 years and older undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse: do practice trends differ by route of surgery?

Authors:  Kristie A Greene; Allison M Wyman; Nupur Tamhane; Jean Paul Tanner; Renee M Bassaly; Jason L Salemi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.

Authors:  Ornella Sizzi; Pierluigi Paparella; Claudio Bonito; Raffaele Paparella; Alfonso Rossetti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.