Literature DB >> 33660000

Adnexal surgery at the time of hysterectomy in women 65 years and older undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse: do practice trends differ by route of surgery?

Kristie A Greene1, Allison M Wyman2, Nupur Tamhane2, Jean Paul Tanner3, Renee M Bassaly2, Jason L Salemi3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to determine whether the rate of adnexal surgery varies by route of hysterectomy in women over the age of 65 undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse. We hypothesized that women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy would be less likely to undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) at the time of their hysterectomy for prolapse.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional analysis using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Our primary outcome was concomitant adnexal surgery performed at the time of hysterectomy, classified into five groups: BSO, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO), bilateral salpingectomy (BS), other adnexal surgery, and no adnexal surgery. The study sample included women aged 65 years and older who underwent hysterectomy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2014 and with a diagnosis of genital prolapse.
RESULTS: Of the 91,292 patients over the age of 65 who underwent a hysterectomy for prolapse, the majority of hysterectomies were vaginal (69%), followed by abdominal (13%), laparoscopic (11%), and robotic (7%). The number of women having a hysterectomy and undergoing a BSO was much lower for vaginal than for other hysterectomy types; 20.3% of women undergoing vaginal hysterectomies had a BSO, compared with 79.2% in abdominal, 81.8% in laparoscopic, and 73.8% in robotic-assisted procedures. Women who received vaginal hysterectomies were five times as likely (RR: 5.02, 95% CI: 4.70-5.35) to have no concomitant adnexal procedure compared with other routes of hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Women over the age of 65 undergoing hysterectomy for prolapse are significantly less likely to have adnexal surgery if undergoing hysterectomy via vaginal route compared with the other routes.
© 2021. The International Urogynecological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adnexal surgery; Pelvic organ prolapse; Vaginal hysterectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33660000     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04663-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  7 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Success and Complications of Salpingectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Magali Robert; David Cenaiko; Jasmine Sepandj; Stanislaw Iwanicki
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Predictors of successful salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Deborah R Karp; Marium Mukati; Aimee L Smith; Gabriel Suciu; Vivian C Aguilar; G Willy Davila
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Factors affecting the feasibility of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse.

Authors:  Lena Dain; Yoram Abramov
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  A prospective study to evaluate oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  A Davies; H O'Connor; A L Magos
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-09

6.  The place of oophorectomy at vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  S S Sheth
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-07

7.  Transvaginal mobilization and removal of ovaries and fallopian tubes after vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  L A Ballard; M D Walters
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.661

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.