Literature DB >> 8811743

Naming in young children: a dumb attentional mechanism?

L B Smith1, S S Jones, B Landau.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that young children selectively attend to some object properties and ignore others when generalizing a newly learned object name. Moreover, the specific properties children attend to depend on the stimulus and task context. The present study tested an attentional account: that children's feature selection in name generalization is guided by non-strategic attentional processes that are minimally influenced by new conceptual information presented in the task. Four experiments presented 3-year-old children and adults with novel artifacts consisting of distinctive base objects with appended parts. In a Name condition, subjects were asked whether test objects had the same name as the exemplar. In a Similarity condition, subjects made similarity judgments for the same objects. Subjects in two experiments were shown a function for either the base object or the parts. Both adults' naming and similarity judgments were influenced by the functional information. Children's similarity judgments were also influenced by the functions. However, children's naming was immune to influence from information about function. Instead, children's feature selection in naming was shifted only by changes in the relative salience of base objects and parts. The results are consistent with the idea that dumb attentional processes are responsible for young children's smart generalizations of novel words to new instances. Potential mechanisms to explain these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8811743     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00709-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  43 in total

1.  Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training.

Authors:  Pauline J Horne; C Fergus Lowe; Valerie R L Randle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Naive theory and transfer of learning: when less is more and more is less.

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky; Margie A Spino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  Do lions have manes? For children, generics are about kinds rather than quantities.

Authors:  Amanda C Brandone; Andrei Cimpian; Sarah-Jane Leslie; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-01-11

4.  Adjective semantics, world knowledge and visual context: comprehension of size terms by 2- to 7-year-old Dutch-speaking children.

Authors:  Elena Tribushinina
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-06

5.  Fast-mapping placeholders: Using words to talk about kinds.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Amanda C Brandone
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2010-07-01

6.  Conceptual influences on induction: A case for a late onset.

Authors:  Vladimir M Sloutsky; Wei Sophia Deng; Anna V Fisher; Heidi Kloos
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Object identification and lexical/semantic access in children: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of word-picture matching.

Authors:  Vincent J Schmithorst; Scott K Holland; Elena Plante
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Development of Tool Representations in the Dorsal and Ventral Visual Object Processing Pathways.

Authors:  Alyssa J Kersey; Tyia S Clark; Courtney A Lussier; Bradford Z Mahon; Jessica F Cantlon
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  The emergent executive: a dynamic field theory of the development of executive function.

Authors:  Aaron T Buss; John P Spencer
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2014-06

10.  Grounding Action Words in the Sensorimotor Interaction with the World: Experiments with a Simulated iCub Humanoid Robot.

Authors:  Davide Marocco; Angelo Cangelosi; Kerstin Fischer; Tony Belpaeme
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.