Literature DB >> 8807271

A review of past research on changes in hearing aid benefit over time.

C W Turner1, L E Humes, R A Bentler, R M Cox.   

Abstract

Hearing aid benefit refers to a relative change in performance on a particular measure between aided and unaided listening conditions. A number of studies in recent years have investigated the hypothesis that hearing aid benefit increases over time after the initial fitting of the aid. Both objective (speech recognition) and subjective (questionnaire) measures have been used to measure hearing aid benefit. Some studies have reported a positive increase over time in group mean benefit, and some have reported no change in benefit, whereas none have reported a group mean negative change in benefit. However, individual subjects in these studies can show changes in benefit in either a positive or negative direction. The variability across subjects in each study has been large in comparison with the observed amount of benefit increase. In this review of the literature, it is argued that the studies present essentially similar results and the range of values across subjects in the various studies shows considerable overlap. Although there does appear to be a tendency for hearing aid benefit to increase over time, there are other, much stronger, factors influencing changes in hearing aid benefit that make it impossible at present to predict which patients will show a reliable increase (or decrease) in hearing aid benefit over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8807271     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199617031-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  17 in total

Review 1.  Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-09

Review 2.  Reorganization of the adult auditory system: perceptual and physiological evidence from monaural fitting of hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Kevin J Munro
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

3.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

4.  Outcome measures in the hearing aid fitting/selection process.

Authors:  B E Weinstein
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1997-12

5.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

6.  A sensitive period for the impact of hearing loss on auditory perception.

Authors:  Bradley N Buran; Emma C Sarro; Francis A M Manno; Ramanjot Kang; Melissa L Caras; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Relationship between age of hearing-loss onset, hearing-loss duration, and speech recognition in individuals with severe-to-profound high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Fabien Seldran; Stéphane Gallego; Christophe Micheyl; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02-25

8.  Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Jani A Johnson; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.

Authors:  Susan Scollie; Richard Seewald; Leonard Cornelisse; Sheila Moodie; Marlene Bagatto; Diana Laurnagaray; Steve Beaulac; John Pumford
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

10.  The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Emily Bates; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.