D J Hennrikus1, R W Jeffery, H A Lando. 1. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55454-1015, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence of occasional smoking in a population of working adults, compared the characteristics of occasional and daily smokers, and prospectively examined the long-term smoking patterns of occasional smokers. METHODS: At 32 Minnesota work sites, 5681 randomly selected workers were surveyed at baseline; 5248 of these were surveyed again 2 years later. A cross-sectional sample of 5817 workers was also surveyed at follow-up. RESULTS: Occasional smokers constituted 18.3% of all smokers in the baseline sample and 21.5% of all smokers in the cross-sectional sample surveyed 2 years later. Baseline occasional smokers were significantly more likely than daily smokers to have quit at follow-up. Job monotony or repetitiveness was related to an increase to daily smoking at follow-up among baseline occasional smokers, and a change to a more restrictive workplace smoking policy was associated with quitting. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that a substantial proportion of smokers are low-rate users and suggest that the proportion may be rising. Further research on this group is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the prevalence of occasional smoking in a population of working adults, compared the characteristics of occasional and daily smokers, and prospectively examined the long-term smoking patterns of occasional smokers. METHODS: At 32 Minnesota work sites, 5681 randomly selected workers were surveyed at baseline; 5248 of these were surveyed again 2 years later. A cross-sectional sample of 5817 workers was also surveyed at follow-up. RESULTS: Occasional smokers constituted 18.3% of all smokers in the baseline sample and 21.5% of all smokers in the cross-sectional sample surveyed 2 years later. Baseline occasional smokers were significantly more likely than daily smokers to have quit at follow-up. Job monotony or repetitiveness was related to an increase to daily smoking at follow-up among baseline occasional smokers, and a change to a more restrictive workplace smoking policy was associated with quitting. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that a substantial proportion of smokers are low-rate users and suggest that the proportion may be rising. Further research on this group is warranted.
Authors: R W Jeffery; J L Forster; S A French; S H Kelder; H A Lando; P G McGovern; D R Jacobs; J E Baxter Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kristen M Hassmiller; Kenneth E Warner; David Mendez; David T Levy; Eduardo Romano Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Carla J Berg; Pamela M Ling; Rashelle B Hayes; Erin Berg; Nikki Nollen; Eric Nehl; Won S Choi; Jasjit S Ahluwalia Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2011-12-07