Literature DB >> 8806100

Correlation of in vitro drug sensitivity testing results with response to chemotherapy and survival: comparison of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer.

G L Shaw1, A F Gazdar, R Phelps, S M Steinberg, R I Linnoila, B E Johnson, H K Oie, E K Russell, B C Ghosh, H I Pass, J D Minna, J L Mulshine, D C Ihde.   

Abstract

Clinical protocols for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were devised to prospectively select individualized chemotherapy based on in vitro drug sensitivity testing (DST) of cell lines derived from the patient's SCLC tumor cell lines or the patient's fresh NSCLC tumor. DST data derived from SCLC tumor cell lines were available for 33/115 (29%) patients. The DST-selected chemotherapy regimen was administered to 21 (18%) patients, or 64% of patients with DST. In SCLC< the DST-selected chemotherapy was administered either during weeks 13-24 following 12 weeks of etoposide/cisplatin, or at relapse after complete response to etoposide/cisplatin. Several parameters of in vitro drug sensitivity were significantly associated (two-sided P < 0.05) with clinical response to primary therapy and also with response to the DST-selected chemotherapy regimen, but were not associated with survival (P = 0.24). Five patients treated with their DST-selected chemotherapy attained a complete or partial response, compared to 5 of 68 who received an empiric regimen (P = 0.057). A total of 36/165 (22%) NSCLC patients had DST successfully completed. These results directed management for 21/96 (22%) patients who eventually received chemotherapy, or 58% of patients with DST. Response to chemotherapy for the patients treated prospectively with their DST-selected chemotherapy regimen (2/21; 9%) was not significantly different than the response rate for patients treated empirically with etoposide/cisplatin (10/69; 14%) in the absence of in vitro results to direct chemotherapy (P = 0.73). There was no difference in survival by treatment group for the NSCLC patients. The correlation between in vitro and clinical response was not significant for any individual drug or for all drugs considered together, illustrating the poor predictive value of in vitro testing with currently available chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8806100     DOI: 10.1002/jcb.240630513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl        ISSN: 0733-1959


  9 in total

Review 1.  Perspectives in chemosensitivity and chemoresistance assays and their implementation in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Lara Bussmann; Chia-Jung Busch; Balazs B Lörincz; Thorsten Rieckmann; Andreas Block; Rainald Knecht
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Parameters for individualizing systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shirish M Gadgeel; Michele L Cote; Ann G Schwartz; Larry H Matherly; Antoinette Wozniak; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 18.500

3.  Differences in chemosensitivity between primary and paired metastatic lung cancer tissues: In vitro analysis based on the collagen gel droplet embedded culture drug test (CD-DST).

Authors:  Masahiko Higashiyama; Jiro Okami; Jun Maeda; Toshiteru Tokunaga; Ayako Fujiwara; Ken Kodama; Fumio Imamura; Hisayuki Kobayashi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  In vitro assays for the evaluation of drug resistance in tumor cells.

Authors:  Jozef Hatok; Eva Babusikova; Tatiana Matakova; Dusan Mistuna; Dusan Dobrota; Peter Racay
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Assay-based response evaluation in head and neck oncology: requirements for better decision making.

Authors:  Andreas Dietz; Andreas Boehm; Iris-Susanne Horn; Pierre Kruber; Ingo Bechmann; Wojciech Golusinski; Dietger Niederwieser; Ralph Dollner; Torsten W Remmerbach; Christian Wittekind; Stephan Dietzsch; Guido Hildebrandt; Gunnar Wichmann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Tumor and host factors that may limit efficacy of chemotherapy in non-small cell and small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  David J Stewart
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.312

7.  ABCC3 as a marker for multidrug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yanbin Zhao; Hailing Lu; An Yan; Yanmei Yang; Qingwei Meng; Lichun Sun; Hui Pang; Chunhong Li; Xiaoqun Dong; Li Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Exploiting high-throughput cell line drug screening studies to identify candidate therapeutic agents in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Anthony C Nichols; Morgan Black; John Yoo; Nicole Pinto; Andrew Fernandes; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Paul C Boutros; John W Barrett
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  Cancer Stem Cell Assay for the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Candace M Howard; Stephen Bush; Nadim Bou Zgheib; Seth T Lirette; Antonio Cortese; Antonio Mollo; Jagan Valluri; Pier Paolo Claudio
Journal:  HSOA J Stem Cells Res Dev Ther       Date:  2021-09-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.