Literature DB >> 8805961

Using statistical equivalence testing in clinical biofeedback research.

J P Hatch1.   

Abstract

The technique of statistical equivalence testing is described and recommended for use in clinical biofeedback research. Equivalence testing is valuable in aiding the interpretation of negative results or statistically significant results where effects are small in clinical terms. The method is also useful for establishing the similarity of treatment groups at baseline or for showing that the effect of a potentially confounding variable is tolerably small. Finally, equivalence testing is recommended as a method for documenting the equivalence of biofeedback therapy to proven conventional medical therapies in clinical equivalence trials. Examples, drawn from published literature, are provided.

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8805961     DOI： 10.1007/bf02284690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN： 0363-3586


  13 in total

1.  A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  D Hauschke; V W Steinijans; E Diletti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Methodological standards for assessing therapeutic equivalence.

Authors:  B Kirshner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Individual bioequivalence: what matters to the patient.

Authors:  W W Hauck; S Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Power of the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence.

Authors:  K F Phillips
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1990-04

5.  Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups.

Authors:  J L Rogers; K I Howard; J T Vessey
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Cognitive and physiologic responses to EMG biofeedback and three types of pseudofeedback during a muscular relaxation task.

Authors:  J P Hatch; K Klatt; M Fitzgerald; L S Jasheway; J G Fisher
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1983-09

7.  A new statistical procedure for testing equivalence in two-group comparative bioavailability trials.

Authors:  W W Hauck; S Anderson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1984-02

Review 8.  Biofeedback efficacy studies: a critique of critiques.

Authors:  S S Steiner; W M Dince
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1981-09

9.  Effects of group relaxation training and thermal biofeedback on blood pressure and related physiological and psychological variables in essential hypertension.

Authors:  A McGrady
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1994-03

Review 10.  Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 2, Short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological context.

Authors:  R Collins; R Peto; S MacMahon; P Hebert; N H Fiebach; K A Eberlein; J Godwin; N Qizilbash; J O Taylor; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-04-07       Impact factor: 79.321
View more
  5 in total

1.  Linked opening angle and histological and mechanical aspects of the proximal pulmonary arteries of healthy and pulmonary hypertensive rats and calves.

Authors:  Lian Tian; Steven R Lammers; Philip H Kao; Mark Reusser; Kurt R Stenmark; Kendall S Hunter; H Jerry Qi; Robin Shandas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Impact of residual stretch and remodeling on collagen engagement in healthy and pulmonary hypertensive calf pulmonary arteries at physiological pressures.

Authors:  Lian Tian; Steven R Lammers; Philip H Kao; Joseph A Albietz; Kurt R Stenmark; H Jerry Qi; Robin Shandas; Kendall S Hunter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Validation of a pressure diameter method for determining modulus and strain of collagen engagement for long branches of bovine pulmonary arteries.

Authors:  Mark Reusser; Kendall S Hunter; Steven R Lammers; Kurt R Stenmark
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Measurement uncertainty in pulmonary vascular input impedance and characteristic impedance estimated from pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound and pressure: clinical studies on 57 pediatric patients.

Authors:  Lian Tian; Kendall S Hunter; K Scott Kirby; D Dunbar Ivy; Robin Shandas
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  Optimal Scaling of Critical Size for Metamorphosis in the Genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Hironaka; Koichi Fujimoto; Takashi Nishimura
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2019-09-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.