Literature DB >> 8805917

Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.

N G Taylor1, K Ison.   

Abstract

Orthodontic sliding mechanics using preadjusted brackets is a popular approach for achieving incisor retraction. A distally directed force slides the archwire through brackets and tubes in the buccal segments. Friction in the buccal segments contributes resistance to the force required to achieve tooth movement, and techniques to reduce friction reduce the potential for anchorage loss. This in vitro study used an Instron testing machine to assess frictional forces for three types of 0.022 x 0.028 inch brackets: preadjusted stainless steel premolar brackets (Standard Straight Wire, "A" Company, Inc, San Diego, Calif), Activa brackets ("A" Company Inc, San Diego, Calif), and Speed brackets (Strite Industries Ltd), combined with five wire sizes (0.018, 0.020, 0.016 x 0.022, 0.018 x 0.025 and 0.019 x 0.025 inch). A model with one attached molar bracket and one or two premolar brackets simulated the buccal segments. Activa brackets produced the least friction for all wires tested. Speed brackets with round wires showed little frictional force while rectangular wires gave rise to higher forces, at levels similar to those recorded with two Standard Straight Wire brackets. Static friction for round wires in standard brackets was found to be 178-275 gm-force. The ratio of static to dynamic friction was remarkably consistent in all tests. Different methods of ligation were compared for their effect on static friction. Ligation with loosely placed ligatures or stretched modules reduced frictional forces in Standard Straight Wire brackets, the reduction being greatest for round archwires. Frictional forces recorded from archwires secured with elastomeric modules showed a steady reduction over a 3-week period, depending on how long the module had been in position on the bracket.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8805917     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1996)066<0215:FRBOBA>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  17 in total

1.  Lingual orthodontics (part 2): archwire fabrication.

Authors:  D Wiechmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  The influence of bracket design on frictional losses in the bracket/arch wire system.

Authors:  H A Schumacher; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Traditional elastic ligatures versus slide ligation system. A morphological evaluation.

Authors:  R Condò; A Casaglia; E Armellin; S G Condò; L Cerroni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2013-07-15

4.  Friction between Archwire of Different Sizes, Cross Section, Alloy and Brackets Ligated with Different Brands of Low Friction Elastic Ligatures- An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Bhushan Patil; Neeraj Suresh Patil; Veerendra Virupaxappa Kerudi; Shrikant Shrinivas Chitko; Amit Ratanlal Maheshwari; Harshal Ashok Patil; Nikhita Popatrao Pekhale; Pawankumar Dnyandeo Tekale
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Friction properties according to vertical and horizontal tooth displacement and bracket type during initial leveling and alignment.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Canine root/cortical bone relation (CRCR) and the orthodontic tooth movement.

Authors:  Amr R El-Beialy; Noha A El-Ashmawi; Mohamed Abd El-Ghafour
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  A comparative anchorage control study between conventional and self-ligating bracket systems using differential moments.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Francisco Herrero; Amine Fattal; Amirparviz R Davoody; Ravindra Nanda; Flavio Uribe
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Renato Parsekian Martins; Alexandre Protásio Vianna
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Frictional resistance exerted by different lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Luca Lombardo; Weronika Wierusz; Dominique Toscano; Roberto Lapenta; Andrea Kaplan; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ajith R Pillai; Anil Gangadharan; Satheesh Kumar; Anwar Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.